tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888438300076664400.post1610561751743638883..comments2014-12-09T17:25:07.561-08:00Comments on Words and Images: My Rose and the Lily: through Blake with Paine and Brownson (Revision #2)Adamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16302919444091859459noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5888438300076664400.post-21547882311290843572014-11-12T19:34:58.697-08:002014-11-12T19:34:58.697-08:00The previous version of the revision, although bri...The previous version of the revision, although brief, was compact and very well researched. It did a lot of work in a little space. This version is longer and adds some research, but rather than really expanding on the idea of the first version (what exactly does "mystical Christianity" mean, exactly? Is it an individual aberration or part of a larger movement? Etc.), this version offers distractions, if anything. The discussion of Paine and Browson is nearly inarticulate. It's not that you don't understand them - it's that you don't explain why they interest you in relationship with Blake. Why are you bringing them together? What is the significance of this constellation of radical figures, who could just as easily be kept apart? I simply don't understand why you revised in this direction. There's no real argument being made that I can see.Adamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16302919444091859459noreply@blogger.com