In the film, Crumb, we are taken into the subconscious
mind, both past and present, of Robert Crumb. He was brought up in an unhappy
household with a tyrant father and a mother who abused pills while him as well
as his four other siblings saw all that went on behind closed doors. Being raised
in a military family can be a big strain on a kids childhood memories and cause
psychological problems. When it comes to understanding what Crumb’s idea was
behind his illustrations in Genesis,
I believe that one can say he uses the novel and story line to express feelings
about his life and family.
Growing up in a dysfunctional family, R.Crumb turned toward
comics which helped him cope with his grievances growing up as child. As he
states in the documentary, “words fail me, pictures are much better.” When R. Crumb
was 6 years old, he was sexually attracted to Bugs Bunny and would even carry around
a picture of this buck-toothed rabbit in his pocket. At age 12, he developed a
new fixation in which he became obsessed with the Sheena, an actress of the
television series Queen of the Jungle. Once he became a shadow in high school,
he chose to reject society’s conformities because they rejected him and decided
he would use his talent and go down in history as a great cartoonist. His
comics, such as Genesis, have become
more autobiographical throughout the years and his illustrations are so
realistic that they easily pull in the viewers’ attention. He touches on issues
such as sex, drugs, politics, and religion and as stated by Martin Muller, “he
is the Daumier of our time.” His unique
style was somewhat developed during his extensive use of LSD. R.Crumb would do
the unthinkable, always surprising people with his next piece of work.
When looking at Genesis, the illustrations the R.Crumb
has provided I feel are not even close to being “perverted” as some of his
earlier drawings. He definitely tones his style of work down by being less
sexual and illustrates what the words are portraying. Genesis is in a way a
replica of R. Crumb's damaged household. The illustrations succeed at showing how his psychological wounds
contributed to a skill that transforms personal pain into visual mockery. In the
novel R.Crumb shows through his illustrations the stories within show the
families being torn apart because of anger and obsession with no protection from
supreme Being. I believe he does this to show the connection between how he was
treated by his father and mother and how characters throughout Genesis were treated by God. God was
seen as their creator or perhaps father figure by the people but instead he
harmed them, abandoned them, or even killed them. I believe that Crumb used the
stories of Genesis to illustrate his life as a child and adult. He was
unsupported by his peers and rejected by his own father for what societies felt
was not considered right or normal. God tends to carry out the same actions by punishing
people for the actions they carry out that he feels are wrongful in his eyes
but okay in others.
One
last subject to touch on that I thought to be interesting is the way he illustrates
women in Genesis. Yes, he has hostility
for women but accepts women for who they are and it tends to show in his
drawings. As I said early, R.Crumb was sexually attracted to actress Sheena whose
“descendants are the devouring Amazonian women portrayed in work that is often
savagely misogynistic and pornographically explicit” (Holden). If we look at
the women within Genesis this seems
to be the way in which he illustrates the women to be as well which I believe tell
us that he incorporates his desires and obsessions into his masterful artwork.
From his broken apart family to his mental disturbance as a
child, R.Crumb has brilliantly been able to transform pieces of his life into
well thought out comics all pertaining to past and present events.
Crumb, R. The Book of Genesis
Illustrated. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2009.
Crumb. Directed by Terry Zwigoff. 1994; Sony Pictures Classics.
Holden, Stephen. Anger and Obsession: The Life of Robert Crumb. New York Times,
1994.
Here's your argument as I see it: "He was unsupported by his peers and rejected by his own father for what societies felt was not considered right or normal. God tends to carry out the same actions by punishing people for the actions they carry out that he feels are wrongful in his eyes but okay in others." Actually, you have a one sentence version somewhere, but this one is fine. It's a good, interesting argument, a strong reading of his Genesis which could really transform how we understand that text. But at this point, it's a very speculative reading. Some of your discussion of the film seems somewhat directionless, but most of it serves the overall purpose of showing the nature of his family - you then spend much less effort (and in a much vaguer way) connecting that wrecked family to Genesis.
ReplyDeleteHere's what would turn the strong idea into a strong essay. Find a part of the story of Genesis (or a couple parts) which show us, at least semi-directly, how the story of his family gets imposed upon or blended with one of the stories of Genesis.
This is me, not you, and you might have a better approach, but you might do something with fathers attacking their sons (Abraham, both with Ishmael and Isaac), or with punishments or the lack thereof for sexual indiscretion (Ham and Noah, Lot and his daughters, Judah and Tamar). In other words, turn what is a vague but interesting argument into an argument which focuses on a part of the text of Genesis, and therefore can have functioning evidence.