Kelsey Ainsworth
Words and Images
November 17, 2011
Lynn Ward’s
Illustration
Lynd Ward’s illustration on page 151 really caught my eye, which allows for
some powerful interpretations to be introduced in the detail brought out in the
image. This image displays tree limbs overpowering the monster as he struggles
to support himself up before they come crashing down on him. “O! what a
miserable night I passed! The cold stars shone in mockery, and the bare trees
waved their branches about me: now and then the sweet voice of a bird burst
forth amidst the universal stillness” (Shelley, 152). By forming a central
theme of the novel, Mary Shelley emphasizes how knowledge of the
existence of a creator has a crippling effect on the creature as he struggles
to reconcile his own perception of himself with his maddening desire for divine
approval and acceptance. The
monster enters the world under terrible sets of circumstances. He has the
strength of a giant, yet a child’s mind; he has a gentle nature, yet his
appearance defects hide his goodness and make everyone fear and mistreat him.
On top of that, he is rejected by his own creator because of his hideous looks
(Shmoop Editorial Team). On discovering that his own creator is
horrified by his existence, the monster increasingly becomes hopeless about his
position in the world. He faces the tragedy of his existence that he was made
human on the inside, but without the capacity for sociability with others. Beauty is
considered a virtue of the good, while deformity and ugliness are inevitably
associated with evil. Due to this stigma, the monster’s visible defects prevent
him from gaining acceptance into a social sphere – even though he is full of
compassion and goodness on the inside.
Reflecting on the novels theme, we can take this image and can show how the
Monster battles to establish his own identity in struggling with the beliefs
and values of the larger culture.
In society, those in power
cause pressures to be brought upon those who don’t conform to social norms.
“Shelley explores the idea of society in Frankenstein
through demonstrating the way in which society members treat a living product
of scientific knowledge and how this relates to their class and place in
society and their beliefs” (bookrags.com). Detailing society's reaction to the creature that Victor
creates as antagonistic, Shelley suggests that ’scientific knowledge of the
time was not approved by society as it threatened various elements of the
community. God is the only father in society's religious beliefs and these
beliefs were threatened by science as Victor attempts to play the role of God” (bookrags.com). Shelly also
goes on to explore the idea of society through demonstrating the way in which
society members treat a living product of scientific knowledge and how this
relates to their class and place in society and their beliefs. Through this, society's
belief that scientific exploration cannot replace the role that nature plays in
creating a natural world. In order to
comprehend the degree of pressures being put on the monster, it is necessary to
look at the small details carried out in the image. I see this image as if the
monster where blending in with the limbs of the trees which could be
interpreted as him forming into what society sees him as, unnoticed. As stated by the monster, “but
I am a blasted tree; the bolt has entered my soul; and I felt then that I
should survive to exhibit, what I shall soon cease to be - a miserable
spectacle of wrecked humanity" (p.111). The monsters feelings erupt once he
realizes all his efforts to conform to society’s norms were all overlooked. He
was not fixed to be evil, but he becomes evil only after society treats him
like he is because his outward appearance is terrifying. The monster is
obviously different than society’s normal looking human but inside he is just
as beautiful as any other human being. Looking more closely at the image, Ward’s
shading of the trees start out at lighter shades and begin to fade into
darkness on the collapsing end of the branch that continues to be exposed onto
the monster. The darkness symbolizes an extreme weight of society’s pressure crumbling
down on the monster. With the monster not only being right in the middle of the
image and being the darkest object, we can take this to be him fighting to pick
himself back up from all that has be thrown upon him to conform to the social
norms. This provides a powerful basis through conformity “which changes how you
behave to be more like others. This plays to belonging
and esteem
needs as we seek the approval and friendship of others. Conformity can run very
deep, as we will even change our beliefs
and values
to be like those of our peers and admired superiors” (changingminds). ). This
image as a whole is a gothic, dark setting which can be described as the
monsters appearance. Being a part of the
norm in the eyes of the villagers means being naturally born, having beauty, speak
fluently. Abnormalities fall under the categories such as hideous or atypical
features, being created through many artificially parts, not speaking the
language fluently. The monster wants to fit in with the villager but feels he
set up failure. He speaks,
“I had admired the perfect forms of my
cottagers—their grace, beauty, and delicate complexions: but how was I
terrified when I viewed myself in a transparent pool! At first I
started back, unable to believe that it was indeed I who was reflected in the
mirror; and when I became fully convinced that I was in reality the monster
that I am, I was filled with the bitterest sensations of despondence and
mortification. Alas! I did not yet entirely know the fatal effects of the
miserable deformity” (Shelley, 124).
The
illustrations that Ward provides display the shocking realization that the
monster is disfigured and diversified in the parts that he was made up of. On
the page opposite of 124, the image illustrates the monster looking into water
viewing his deformity for the time and he comes to realization of his
abnormality. This is important for comprehending the monster’s agitation, he
knew his body, the limbs that he had and the body parts that were given him.
The monster is terrified and shocked at the sight of his reflection. He was
made from flesh similar to that of humans and is treated much differently
because of his looks. The monster knows he was created by a human
being, Frankenstein, but has been sculpted as this unbeautiful creature as well
as being abandoned and left to survive on his own. The monster proclaims, “Hateful
day when I received life!' I exclaimed in agony. `Accursed creator! Why did you
form a monster so hideous that even you
turned from me in disgust? God, in pity, made man beautiful and alluring, after
his own image; but my form is a filthy type of yours, more horrid even from the
very resemblance” (pg. 144).
As I show the monster being depicted as one
with the tree limbs, we can see how the branches themselves are deformed and
unstable from so much pressure falling down on them. Society disposing of the
monster due to being an outsider and misunderstanding his heartfelt intentions
has led him to become a helpless being. He even states, “These amiable people
to whom I go have never seen me, and known little of me. I am full of fears;
for if I fail there, I am an outcast in the world for ever’” (Shelley, 149). With pressures that are bestowed upon
individuals can cause the feeling of helplessness and abandonment. “Some things
are within our control, and some things are not. It is only after you have
faced up to this fundamental rule and learned to distinguish between what you
can and can't control that inner tranquility and outer effectiveness become
possible... Trying to control or change what we can't only results in
torment" (Lebell). The monster being an outsider himself shows how he
could be misunderstood for his intentions by the villagers. Victor
was his last connection to humanity and to point out the monster is one of many
people in this text that suffers from loneliness, solitude, and an all-around
desire for companionship. The image on 151
obviously displays this idea because he flees to the abandoned forest where he
will not be judge for who he is and what he has been created into. The social
norms of the villagers denied his efforts in trying to conform to their liking
and due to their misunderstanding he rebelled against them. The monster took
matters into his own hands and fought the norms to become his own person.
The idea of beliefs
and values cause society to develop norms that allow put pressure on people to
conform. The villagers welcome those who they feel are worthy enough of their
beliefs and values, so the chances of the monster being accepted into their
social norms was slim to none
Work Cited
http://www.bookrags.com
Lebell, Sharon. 'The Art of Living:
The Classic Manual on Virtue, Happiness, and Effectiveness' -- A New
Interpretation
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein.
The Lynd Ward Illustrated Edition. Mineola, New York: Dover
www.changingminds.org.
webbased
Shmoop
Editorial Team. "Frankenstein Theme of Exploration" Shmoop.com.
Shmoop University, Inc., 11 Nov. 2008. Web. 16 Nov. 2011.
http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=5888438300076664400#editor/target=post;postID=7525440992138925974
ReplyDeleteThe first paragraph goes in a lot of different directions before really focusing on the monster's identity being established in relationship/opposition with the larger world. I feel like this could have been better by being shorter and simpler - you needed to get the to point.
ReplyDeleteThe very long paragraph which includes the citations from bookrags.com and your reading of the illustration is a mess. It's not a mess just because as research this is very dubious (you give weak generalizations about the novel that anyone could make), but because there is a real problem with continuity here. What do the observations that someone is making on bookrags.com about society and science in Shelley's time have to do with Ward's interpreation of the monster's struggle? This is an enormous paragraph which should not only be split into multiple paragraphs, but in which the logical connections between these shorter paragraphs wouldn't be terribly clear.
I liked, and still like, the idea of understanding the monster with a basically sociological approach. He needs to define himself against the crushing views and prejudices of a world in which he has no place; any identity he forms will necessarily be oppositional. I get all of that, and I think it's a good approach.
In this revision, though, you aren't really building on the strengths, both present and potential, of that approach. You're adding material that goes in different directions, and you're badly muddying the waters re: whether you're writing about Shelley's Frankenstein, Ward's interpretation of it, or whether you're making a connection between the two. Adding some mediocre literary criticism on the novel, while continuing to focus in your own reading on the images, tends simply to make it hard to figure out what you're really up to.
Your research needed to match your actual interests, and your way of dealing with Shelley vs. Ward, or of dealing with both, needed to be accomodated, before your argument could have even completely emerged.