Johnny Truant’s mind is turning on
itself. Through his journal entries, we see Johnny forget what he does for
months at a time, attempt to lie to himself as he grows weaker and more insane.
He creeps close to ending not only his own life, but imagines committing murder
as well. The Navidson Record possesses
him; he searches for its meaning and a trace of its reality across the country.
He has become so deeply entangled with its fiction that he seems to give up his
will to live. The darkness of the halls in the house constantly surround him
and cloud his vision. Jimmy Corrigan is unable to escape his fantasies as well.
He lives in a world filled with daydreams that leave the awkward and lonely
reality of his life behind. He cuts himself off from the world with these
fantasies, cuts himself off from the only chance he has at connecting with
family. Stumbling through life and saying very little, Jimmy’s isolation stems
from the same behavior that Johnny’s does (along with Navidson and Zampano, for
that matter): reality has been overtaken with obsessive illusion. The parallels
lie not only within the characters, but are outwardly expressed in the pages of
their stories, turning the illusion, ironically, into a very tangible reality
that can change the way we view illusion entirely outside of fictional
universes.
Will
Navidson’s house is the clear catalyst of the illusions that characters feel in
House of Leaves. We can understand
the first-degree psychological consequences by first looking at Will Navidson
himself, and his interesting relationship with the place. As noted early in the
book, Will’s childhood has a great impact on his identification with the
darkness and depth of the place: he identifies with the absence felt when left
practically orphaned, the absence that the halls of the house embody in their
ashen walls and windless corridors. Because he identifies so closely with the
house, Will begins to develop almost an obsession with it. He leaves behind the
realities of his family and risks his life to try to understand the house. In Aguirre’s
analysis of closed spaces in the horror genre, he looks specifically at
labyrinths in one section, explaining that a prisoner within the labyrinth with
either escape or submit: it “is something to get out of – or to submit and
adapt to” (Aguirre, p 54). Rather than escaping, Navidson wishes to explore and
stay, to try to live within a deathly environment. He is becoming one with the
illusion as he is drawn to it. On his final return – Exploration # 5 – Navidson
is unlike any of the other characters as he feels he must go back. Whether it
is due to a motivation to possess, a motivation to self-punish, or the
psychological after-effects of his earlier explorations, Navidson had grown too
attached to the darkness and absence that the house provided. He could not
re-enter into reality because he was too wrapped up in the illusions that the
house created by surrounding him with an absolute silence and darkness in which
he could create a final judgment for himself and an escape from the world of
Delial and the fame she brought on him.
If
it was escape reality that Navidson imagined within the house, the illusions of
The Navidson Record almost seemed to
entrap Johnny Traunt. He spiraled deeper and deeper into illusion as his life
began to revolve completely – in waking and sleeping – around Zampano’s writing
and the mysterious house. Obsession brought paranoia, extreme fear, near
starvation. He no longer talks to those who once mattered to him – Lude dies in
his absence – and he loses the ability to care even for himself. Like Navidson,
Johnny is obsessed with the house and its mysterious power. It has the ability
to exist where it shouldn’t be able to exist, it can take lives and change its
shape at will. As I mentioned above, it was the emptiness of the house that
drew Navidson to it. Johnny was perhaps drawn to the house because of its
ability to shift and move. He’s spent a lot of his time with Lude creating a
world and a life from his own imagination – shifting his past and to change his
present. The book he finds left behind by Zampano creates a different kind of
escape and, while it brings him close to death, it also takes him away from the
harshness of his own reality. Own one hand, this rejection of reality and
obsession with the house on Ash Tree Lane connects him to both Navidson and
Zampano. We can even see points where the connection becomes so strong that
parts of Zampano’s story exist in Johnny’s world: after discovering others have
read his compilation of Zampano’s work (which in and of itself is an instance
where The Navidson Record seems
real), Johnny goes to the park to sleep and “stretched out beneath an old ash
tree” (Danielewski, p 514). Johnny buys the gun Holloway wielded to protect himself
from the ‘monster’ within the house. He believes his own house will begin to
expand and shrink as the Navidson’s did, and obsessively measures the
dimensions of his apartment. The lines separating reality and fantasy,
separating one world from another, are clearly blurred. Even if Johnny isolates
himself from his friends and co-workers, he is connected to the other levels of
Danielewski’s novel through his obsession with illusion; connected both
psychologically and physically.
The
impact of choosing illusion over reality can also be seen clearly in Jimmy Corrigan, where Jimmy is
constantly fantasizing about his world, but living only through fantasy and
very much ignoring the reality of his life. Jimmy’s character is derived from
the world of over-analyzing, as he tends to analyze to the point where he
imagines and dreams up scenarios for most of his life, creating a constant mix
of fantasy and reality for the reader. Looking at his life from every angle,
Jimmy creates in his head a diagram of possibilities – he imagines himself a
hero at some times, a murderer at others, a lover, a husband, but never the
role he acts out in reality. Like Navidson, Jimmy hides his true self in
darkness: for Navidson, this darkness was found within the house; for Jimmy it
is found in his silence as he simply observes the world around it and chooses
not to interact. These actions prove to be isolating for Jimmy, as he misses a
chance to bond with his father and sister, to better understand his past. One
place where we can clearly see a missed opportunity to connect with others is
with Amy. By staying together and attempting to understand their history, Amy
and Jimmy could have created a more human connection with each other in the
present: “Jimmy’s disappearance is a tragic failure of family reconciliation”
(Ball, 2010) for both characters. If the past is emphasized, Jimmy fails to
realize its importance to his and Amy’s present because of his inability to
remain in the present. The fear and paranoia Jimmy feels because of his
tendency to over-analyze his world and imagine all possible outcomes (often
with focus on the bad) is literally preventing him from creating connections in
reality. Even an examination of Chris Ware’s comic style blurs the lines
between reality and illusion: in David Ball’s analysis, he looks at the fact
that Ware’s work falls somewhere between “illusionism” and “realism” (Ball,
2010). Rather than showing us the gritty images of realism, Ware’s drawings are
able to show the emotions that realism can’t. This allows us to better see
Jimmy’s feelings and thoughts, the fantasies he holds in his head that we
wouldn’t understand or see in realism. This fact shows us more about Jimmy
Corrigan’s character, and shows how impossible it is to rely on even the author
to create a clear distinction between fantasy and reality for the reader. Jimmy
Corrigan is lost in fantasy, isolated from others, and leaves the reader just
as confused in trying to distinguish between the reality and illusion as well.
By comparing the psychological
impact this mental state and obsession with fantasy and escape has on the
characters in these books we can see how connected the characters really are.
To understand the underlying psychology of how reality and illusion are formed,
it is important to first look at the concept of ‘reality’ in general: how we
define reality is very subjective – reality differs immensely from one subject
to another. Looking at the overlap of
personal realities is where Emmanuel Cassimatis develops his ideas about the
ability of reality to both isolate and connect people. He talks about the
subjectivity of reality, saying “Each one of us lives in his/her own reality,
that is, experiences perceptions, feelings, and events in life as real” (2000).
The mind of each individual is then reflected in the reality that he perceives
around him, unlike any other’s realities completely, but similar in very
important ways. When realities overlap, they become more accepted. Cassimatis
refers to this overlapping of realities as sharing, and explains that “This
sharing validates, and often adds meaning to our personal reality… But again,
does sharing by itself make a reality more real?” (2000). What one person sees
as a private reality might be perceived by others as illusion or fantasy. In
this context, it is much harder to see someone like Jimmy Corrigan or Johnny
Truant as mentally unstable; perhaps their ‘illusion’ is a reality that most
cannot perceive.
If one individual
differs greatly in his perception of what is real, as, for example, Johnny
Truant does, they are seen as mentally incapable or unstable. This is where
some of the foundations of mental illness come from. There was some discussion
about the possibility of mental illness as a diagnosis for Jimmy Corrigan
because of his very awkward, anti-social, and isolated behavior. He tends to
avoid the world we see as normal reality, instead retreating to his own
fantasies. These could be a reflection to the reality he finds within his own
mind, not seen by anyone else and therefore very difficult to accept as the
truth. The fact that these fantasies are such a large part of his life and no
one else’s isolate him from other, prevent connections with those he should be
closest to. Johnny Truant’s life seems to fall into disrepair and some might
argue he has developed a mental illness from his depression as well. By
understanding that his reality has become The
Navidson Record, it’s clear this has isolated him from the rest of the
world because he is no longer able to share the connection of understanding the
reality of others as his own. This analysis of how mental illness develops
shows that these characters who seem mentally ill should not be seen as
incapable of higher mental functions or socialization. They are not less
intelligent than those we perceive to be mentally healthy, but these
characters’ realities have shifted from the norm. They live in a world that
comes from their own minds, rather than sharing the world many others do.
One major
consequence for the projection of the mind into reality in these novels is the
structure of the novels themselves. We can look first at House of Leaves, where the architecture of the novel seems almost
entirely dependent on what is happening within the story and the minds of the
characters. Simply reading the book creates a maze of words. Footnotes
reference each other and other sections of the book entirely, the narrative is
often scattered throughout the pages, especially during Explorations 4 and 5,
where Holloway and his team and then Navidson in turn try to either conquer or
understand the house. Certain passages are reflective of the literal physical
details of the story, like the sudden scattering of individual words across the
page as Jed’s skull is shattered (and his hopes to escape with his life along
with it) (194-205), or the climbing of Navidson up the stairs in the depths of
the house reflected by the arrangement of words in a way that forces the reader
to carefully climb up the page, reading in an almost backwards arrangement of
sentences (440-441). Caroline Hagood looks at the architecture of House of Leaves in-depth and the fact
that “Danielewski's novel also has an innovative, obviously architectural
textual layout that corresponds to its plot and mimics the labyrinthine
structure of the house itself,” (Hagood, 2012). She describes the fact that the
design and unconventional presentation of the narrative creates the connection
between the different characters within the book. We watch Johnny’s life become
immersed in House of Leaves by
literally reading his autobiographical footnotes within Zampano’s story, often
interrupting it and occasionally changing it to fit his own desires. Zampano
and Johnny are connected purely by a fictional story, but the consequences of
this fiction create a real connection between the two as Johnny becomes more
and more immersed in Zampano’s book and life. As Hagood points out, “This
suggests that the labyrinth at the heart of the novel is not only a single
location that the characters explore, but also a trope for the intricate
structural composition of the narratives of each of the "authors,"
including Truant, Zampano, Danielewski, Navidson, and even Navidson's wife,
Karen” (2012). The structure of the novel is both reflective of the internal
action of the novel and serves as a way to connect the characters more
physically to one another.
This raises an
interesting point: I said earlier in an examination of the psychological
theories about reality that a common reality was a way to connect different
people (or characters) to one another. The structure of the book clearly serves
a similar purpose by creating physical connections. If these two details
together are what establish connection between Navidson, Zampano, Johnny, and others,
this shows that the architecture in House
of Leaves is really a reflection not only of the physical happenings within
the story but a manifestation of the mental processes for the characters. The
realities that exist within the minds of the characters are truly reflected in
their surroundings as the book takes on the characteristics of these realities.
The idea of reality and illusion does not just exist within the minds of
characters, but within the pages of the book itself, creating illusions for the
reader as well. A book composed of internal thoughts is not only a maze in and
of itself, but creates a sense of mistrust, as every whim of a characters mind
could be reflected in the story. At one point, Johnny points out that he
decided to add a word to the story (changing “heater” to “water heater”) in
order to properly segue into his footnote. It’s impossible to guess what other
words, phrases, or pages Johnny could have changed. He restores sections
Zampano wanted crossed out for the purpose of preserving what Zampano left
behind, but in doing so he creates fundamental changes in the story. We can’t
take Zampano’s work for the truth either, despite the fact that Johnny
eventually comes to see it that way. The careful footnotes and references Zampano
makes are entirely a reflection of his own mind, and probably of the reality
that exists within it. The dark world that his blindness forced him into could
have brought about the creation of a story revolving around darkness and
absence. In the end, the world created by the narrators in House of Leaves is built from the labyrinth of their minds, leaving
the reader wondering where the line can be drawn between reality and fantasy.
The line between
those two is just as blurry in Jimmy
Corrigan. Ware constantly shifts between Jimmy’s fantasy and Jimmy’s
reality, with hardly any transition to distinguish between the two. At one
point we even realize that Jimmy’s fantasies can have a physical impact on
reality. He wakes up after dreaming of himself as a robot to find himself with
the crutch from his dream and an unexplained broken foot. In Bredehoft’s
analysis of Architecture,
Multidimensionality, and Time within Jimmy
Corrigan, he looks especially closely at the cut-outs that appear in two
places within the story. He writes that these cut-outs show the way the book
manipulates our normal conceptions of narrative flow and time. By doing this,
they manipulate the very structures that hold reality together, bringing the
whole book physically closer to illusion. They are certainly not integral to
the plot, but they are instead one clear example where the kind of thinking
that happens within Jimmy’s head is transferred into the story, interrupting it
and even going beyond the two dimensional structure of a book by truly being
objects that could be cut from the pages and assembled. The strange transitions
and interruptions to the story are completely purposeful and show the physical
consequences of Jimmy’s life of illusion. His life is often dull, depression,
and awkward, but his fantasies are always dramatic and exciting. For him, the
world within his mind is the better one to be in. To the outside world, he may
seem anti-social and even seem mentally ill, but the subjectivity of that
analysis can be put to the test when looking at the fact that Jimmy has a
different, private, reality within his mind, a topic looked at in the
psychological analysis of reality by Cassimatis. Some might write off the idea
of a personal reality as proof of mental disability – he is only truly living
in his own world, in his own head. Yet, the physical consequences are there.
The world he creates in his head comes to the third dimension with the cut-out
zoetrope. There are pages and pages of images and text that bring his mental
world to life just as much as reality is brought to life in the pages beside
it. So while he is certainly lost among others because of his inability to
accept their realities and connect with them, he is not any less capable than
them. He has create a world just as rich, even if it only exists privately.
It seems almost
impossible to speak objectively about reality and illusion. Through the
analysis of the dichotomy and coexistence of these two concepts in House of Leaves and Jimmy Corrigan, we can better understand that they are far more
intertwined than they seem to be. The house seems like an impossible reality.
It is physically larger (by a lot) on the inside than the outside. It somehow
reflects the psychological state of those who enter it. But it is a reality for
those who enter, those who are lost within it, those who die because of it. The
house is physically represented in the pages of the book itself through black
spaces and dark squares and a physical maze of words. It therefore becomes a
part of the collective reality of those who read it and connections are created
between minds based on a physical impossibility. Johnny Truant is certainly
obsessive and his paranoia stems from the illusion he lives in, but looking at
it now it needs to be noted that he cannot be judged as someone mentally
incapable of existing in the real world, simply because he lives in a different
world than others. He does not share their reality and so he is dismissed. In
the novels these ideas are supported by the physical reflection of private
realities in the architecture of the book, but outside of fiction there may not
be such physical manifestations. Reality is truly subjective, and a better
understanding of that concept could foster a better understanding of how we
define mental illness.
Works Cited
Aguirre, Manuel. The
Closed Space: Horror Literature and Western Symbolism. Manchester. Manchester University Press, 1990. Print.
Ball, David M., and Kuhlman, Martha
B., eds. Comics of Chris Ware.
Jackson, MS, USA: University Press of Mississippi, 2010. Print.
Bredehoft, Thomas A. "Comics Architecture,
Multidimensionality, and Time: Chris Ware's Jimmy Corrigan: The Smartest Kid on
Earth." MFS Modern Fiction Studies 52.4 (2007; 2006): 869-90.
Cassimatis, Emmanuel G. "Reality." Journal of the
American Academy of Psychoanalysis 28.4 (2000): 717.
Danilewski, Mark Z. “House of Leaves.” New York: Pantheon
Books, 2000. Print.
Hagood, Caroline. “Exploring the Architecture of Narrative
in House of Leaves.” Pennsylvania Literary Journal (4:1) Spring 2012,
87-97,140.
Ware, Chris. Jimmy Corrigan: the
Smartest Kid on Earth. New York: Pantheon Books, 2000. Print.
“The parallels lie not only within the characters, but are outwardly expressed in the pages of their stories, turning the illusion, ironically, into a very tangible reality that can change the way we view illusion entirely outside of fictional universes.” – You have many strengths as a writer, but this thesis has merits, but it’s also a bit of a showcase for your disinclination to present a clear argument from the start of an essay. What, then, is the impact that these two books should have on the way we perceive realitya and illusion? It could only do good things for the essay to attempt an initial answer to that question.
ReplyDeleteI liked your second paragraph a lot. “He could not re-enter into reality because he was too wrapped up in the illusions that the house created by surrounding him with an absolute silence and darkness in which he could create a final judgment for himself and an escape from the world of Delial and the fame she brought on him.” This ending, though, as much as I admire the line of argument in teh second paragraph, seems to take for granted that the house is a place of illusions. Or are you arguing that the house is perfectly real, but that Will’s psychology fills in abundant illusions?
“He’s spent a lot of his time with Lude creating a world and a life from his own imagination – shifting his past and to change his present. The book he finds left behind by Zampano creates a different kind of escape and, while it brings him close to death, it also takes him away from the harshness of his own reality” Let me introduce a counterargument here. Remember “Lude’s list” and “Lude’s list revisited”? Those are two alternate versions of a list of Lude’s sexual conquests for a month, the first of which emphases them as conquests and the second of which emphasises them as people, especially their serious problems. I would argue that it is the house/manuscript which gives Johny the analytical tools to see beneath the fun illusions of “Lude’s list” and get to what Captain Ahab in Moby Dick calls the “little lower layer”. In short, Johny’s analysis of the House leads him to truth. Now, I’m not saying you need to agree with my take on it, but I wish you’d spent more time questioning how Johnny uses the House to think about reality, rather than just framing it in terms of illusions - there’s a danger of oversimplification here.
“Jimmy creates in his head a diagram of possibilities” - this is very nice, although I’d like you to relate it directly to an actual diagram in the book. However, your reading of Jimmy Corrigan overall seems rushed - is it really important, or is it secondary compared to your interest in HOL?
“In this context, it is much harder to see someone like Jimmy Corrigan or Johnny Truant as mentally unstable; perhaps their ‘illusion’ is a reality that most cannot perceive.” So are you dealing with “illusion” or “interpretation”? Maybe what you’re doing here is figuring out the more detailed/final version of your thesis?
Skipping forward a little bit, here’s a sentence I want to say something about: “In the end, the world created by the narrators in House of Leaves is built from the labyrinth of their minds, leaving the reader wondering where the line can be drawn between reality and fantasy.” One constructive way of addressing this problem would have been to deal with one of the maze of references within Danielewski’s text which deal with problems of interpretation and reality - e.g., Derrida, Heidegger, or the Cervantes/Borges material that I discussed at length. My difficulty with your essay so far is that you don’t seem to be advancing much of interpretation of what the problem of illusion (or the problem of interpetation) means within the novel. To put it another way, I think a close reading of one or more of the central illusions of the novel would have helped you develop your argument, but by remaining at a fairly general level you’ve struggled to advance it.
ReplyDeleteRe: Jimmy again. “He has create a world just as rich, even if it only exists privately.” But I think you just demonstrated that his “private” illusions invade “our” reality, including through curious devices like the cutouts (I would have also mentioned the various ways the book forces us to interact with it - e.g., holding it in strange ways). Neither Ware nor (especially) Danielewski are interested in strictly private illusions/interpretations.
Overall: At the end of the day, you aren’t doing a convincing reading of how subjectivity/illusion + reality/interpretation works in the two books together. I think the obvious route to a clearer argument (and one, incidentally, which would have allowed for deeper, more details readings - you have oddly little to say about the interesting details of Jimmy and Johnny’s fantasies) would have been to cut one book entirely, and then either explore subjectivity in HOL or how Jimmy’s problems with reality have a physical manifestation in our world. There’s plenty of good writing here, and some good moments, but the project as a whole doesn’t come together.
Skipping forward a little bit, here’s a sentence I want to say something about: “In the end, the world created by the narrators in House of Leaves is built from the labyrinth of their minds, leaving the reader wondering where the line can be drawn between reality and fantasy.” One constructive way of addressing this problem would have been to deal with one of the maze of references within Danielewski’s text which deal with problems of interpretation and reality - e.g., Derrida, Heidegger, or the Cervantes/Borges material that I discussed at length. My difficulty with your essay so far is that you don’t seem to be advancing much of interpretation of what the problem of illusion (or the problem of interpetation) means within the novel. To put it another way, I think a close reading of one or more of the central illusions of the novel would have helped you develop your argument, but by remaining at a fairly general level you’ve struggled to advance it.
ReplyDeleteRe: Jimmy again. “He has create a world just as rich, even if it only exists privately.” But I think you just demonstrated that his “private” illusions invade “our” reality, including through curious devices like the cutouts (I would have also mentioned the various ways the book forces us to interact with it - e.g., holding it in strange ways). Neither Ware nor (especially) Danielewski are interested in strictly private illusions/interpretations.
Overall: At the end of the day, you aren’t doing a convincing reading of how subjectivity/illusion + reality/interpretation works in the two books together. I think the obvious route to a clearer argument (and one, incidentally, which would have allowed for deeper, more details readings - you have oddly little to say about the interesting details of Jimmy and Johnny’s fantasies) would have been to cut one book entirely, and then either explore subjectivity in HOL or how Jimmy’s problems with reality have a physical manifestation in our world. There’s plenty of good writing here, and some good moments, but the project as a whole doesn’t come together.