On the surface the
Bechdel’s seem like a rather traditional family. They have their quirks but to an
outsider they seem very normal. However, from the very first page of Fun Home by Alison Bechdel, readers
become aware that her family is far from standard. The Bechdel family home
represents the front the family (especially Bechdel’s father) puts up while the
funeral home, referred to as the fun home, serves as a more accurate portrayal.
The family home in all of its grandeur
is a symbol of the luxurious, rich, Gatsby inspired life Bechdel’s father
believes he has. However, this home as well as the fun home exists as a
constant reminder of the life he wants but never fully achieves, as well as a manifestation
of the secrets he is hiding.
The Bechdel family home is filled with artifacts that
seem to draw close parallels to the type of man Mr. Bechdel believes himself to
be. In a way, the extravagance of the home is an illusion, much like the
illusion Mr. Bechdel creates for himself. Bechdel says “he could spin garbage
into gold” and two pictures show her father refurbishing an old headboard
pulled from the trash into a fancy new looking one (Bechdel 6). Mr. Bechdel
does not have the financial means to actually live like the characters in F.
Scott Fitzgerald novels, so he fakes it; he fools himself into thinking he has
everything he wants. He is essentially creating this roaring 1920’s Gatsby lifestyle
from thin air. By turning old trash into something new, he believes he can make
himself into the man he wants to be.
Later
in the book Bechdel includes a picture of her father “…walking down Christopher
Street in his borrowed Brooks Brothers finery” (Bechdel 105). This quote is
significant in a few ways. First, Christopher Street is famous for being one of
the main streets in New York City’s gay culture. Second, Mr. Bechdel may be
wearing Brooks Brothers, a very high end designer for men’s dress clothes, but
his suit is borrowed. The suit represents everything that is only slightly out
of reach for Mr. Bechdel. As he is walking down Christopher Street he is recognizing
the fact that he is gay and his secret surfaces. However, even when he is acknowledging
his sexuality he is still pretending. He is on Christopher Street yet he can
never fully be part of it because he has a wife and a family. He walks around
in designer clothes as if they are his own but in reality they are borrowed and
will need to be returned. He wants desperately to be the man who can afford luxury
so he pretends to be by decorating himself and his house. He is essentially
acting as someone else while avoiding full acceptance of who he really is.
In the beginning of the book Bechdel describes her father
as “…an alchemist of appearance, a savant of surface, a Deadalus of design”
(Bechdel 6). He spends years building and restoring the family home. Bechdel
describes the house as his “passion”, going on to say “and I mean passion in
every sense of the word” (Bechdel 7). The picture accompanying this statement
is very intriguing. It shows her father walking slightly slumped over and
carrying a very large banister over his shoulder. He is walking in front of the
home that is colored in black. The image is strikingly similar to many images
depicting the Passion of Christ. The story of the Passion of Christ represents Jesus’s
suffering and the burden he has to bear (the literal burden of the cross he
carries, and the figurative burden of saving mankind from sin). It is
interesting that Bechdel refers to her father’s labor on their family home as
his passion, yet the association makes sense. Mr. Bechdel has an insatiable fascination
with architecture and design, but instead of becoming an architect he works as
an English teacher. The home he has created is his “cross to bear”. While he
loves it, it is a reminder of the ways in which he is not fulfilled as a
person, just as both the Brooks Brothers suit and Christopher Street do. The house
is a burden to him because in combination with the things he has actually done
in his life, the home only represents the life he pretends to have. Now, instead
of expressing who he is and what he loves through himself and his actions, he
has built an entire mansion around the idea of the person he wants to be yet
failed to become, and he lives with the reminder every day.
In contrast, the fun home is a slightly more accurate representation
of the Bechdels. In reference to the fun home’s decoration, Bechdel states, “…the
rooms were hung with dark velvet drapery. This ensured a somber mood on the
sunniest of days” (Bechdel 36). The fun home is always dark even when the sun is
shining, and this makes the home a more “real” representation of the Bechdels.
They are a family with many dark secrets and many unhappy memories. The fun
home reflects this with its dark, more modest décor. Yet the secrets and hidden
pasts of the family eventually surface, as represented by the beam of light
that can be seen shining in to the funeral room on the image on page 36. Also, it
is ironic that the life Mr. Bechdel is actually living is depicted through a
home designed for those who have died, and I think this says a great deal about
the fact that Mr. Bechdel never actually lives.
Through the décor of the Bechdel family home, readers can
see that Mr. Bechdel is often under the illusion of grandeur. Readers can tell
it is and illusion because nothing he has is “real” and he has nothing that he
really wants. His daughter is not the “girly girl” he wishes she was, his home
is not the Gatsby mansion he dreams of, and his job is not something he really
enjoys either. He hides behind the décor of the family home yet the true feelings
he has and the true life he lives is depicted in the fun home.
I think you have very interesting ideas on Bechdel! Your essay is well formulated and I can clearly see your argument. One possibly problematic problem I find is that in the first paragraph, you refer to the family home as a house that represents what Bechdel's father believes he has, then you say that the family home is what he wishes he has. I think it’s confusing to say it is what he thinks he has, but also what he wants. I don't know if you meant this as two separate ideas or one idea, but maybe different wording would make it clearer.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the picture of her father walking is an important image, but I don't think it connects to your thesis very well. Your argument is about the house more than his appearance. However, I really like the connection you made with Christ and the connection between the burden he must bear.
I think your essay would be stronger if you took away the ideas about the fun home (they seem more of an afterthought that you included in the second to last paragraph) and focused on the family home. Also, it seems like you have more evidence for the argument about the family home than the fun home. If you like the parallelism between the two, I think you should find more support to back up your claim on the fun home.
There are several rival arguments in the 1st paragraph. It's especially interesting if " this home as well as the fun home exists as a constant reminder of the life he wants but never fully achieves, as well as a manifestation of the secrets he is hiding." That's a complex argument and a bit of a mouthful, though. We'll see if it works in a short essay.
ReplyDelete"He is essentially creating this roaring 1920’s Gatsby lifestyle from thin air. By turning old trash into something new, he believes he can make himself into the man he wants to be." - I wonder if this wants to be an essay on, say, The Great Gatsby & Bechdel. It's an interesting question, because people do, of course, create themselves in interesting ways in *Gatsby*.
The third paragraph is excellent in itself, as an illustration of Bechdel's complexities. I'd sure like to know what you make of it, though - where does this observation lead? Does this connect with Fitzgerald, or are you going in a different direction here? The next paragraph is even better - "The home he has created is his “cross to bear”. While he loves it, it is a reminder of the ways in which he is not fulfilled as a person, just as both the Brooks Brothers suit and Christopher Street do. " I'm still unclear on where you're going with it, though.
So if the fun house is a place that reveals the true darkness in the family, why is it the "fun" house which the children enjoy? I'm not saying that you're wrong, but it's an interesting problem. Also, how does her father's role as undertaker connect to your argument?
Overall: You have great material here, but the overall argument needs to be clarified and streamlined. Actually, the whole thing could easily become about the relationship between Bechdel's borrowed selves and the crosses he bears (Why does he borrow selves? Why bear crosses? How do those question relate to Fitzgerald? Etc.). You start out vaguely, but fix it by doing some great analysis, but don't really direct that analysis clearly.
Suzanne has some good points, especially in her last paragraph.