The book Storyteller has pictures spread
throughout the book. These pictures are
used to help describe the main point of the story. Silko primarily uses pictures of people from
the text or examples of landscape. One
of the pictures I focused on was a picture of her Grandma A’mooh. The picture is placed six lines into the
passage on page 31. Silko begins the
story describing how she called her grandma the wrong name for many years. She called her Grandma A’mooh due to hearing
her say a Laguna expression of endearment.
The mix up occurred when her grandma was caring for her as a child.
I
decided to analyze the picture during the reading. The picture shows her two sisters and grandma
reading a book. There is a sense of love
and compassion between them. The grandma
has a motherly feel with her wearing an apron and the kids hovering over her. The relationship between them looks close as
if she was a second mother. The kids
have a look of innocence. One of them
has their underwear pulled up higher than her pants. It is fitting that the word used as her name
means endearment. The grandma and the
child depend on each other to get through the day.
The story goes
on the say that the kids eventually took care of her grandma. A part of her story includes helping her
grandma clean yucca roots, carry buckets of coal, and helped keep the fire
burning. In addition, they were afraid
of her falling and hurting herself. It
is hard to say how far apart in time the picture is to the text. The story says most of the help was when she
was in her eighties. The pictures shows
her around that time. Her overall
appearance looks very old and frail.
Silko probably chose that picture because it is how she remembers
Grandma A’mooh. It is also unclear on if
the author is of similar age as her sisters.
There is only mentioning of going to school and growing up beside her
house.
Silko did this
same technique on a short passage about Grampa Hank on page 185. The story is about how Grampa Hank had a
passion for engineering and automobiles. He wanted to design cars, but he was told
Indians weren’t supposed pursue that profession. He listened to his teachers and became a
store clerk. The story is followed by a
picture of Grampa Hank standing by a 1933 Auburn. The car is not the 1957 Thunderbird from the
story. However, the picture follows the
theme of his love for cars.
The image also
shows some of the character’s personality. From the story, it seems like he was an honest
and hard worker. Hank saved up for years
until he was able to buy his dream car. Silko
chose a picture of him dressed in nice clothes.
It portrays him being an average and clean cut man. The style of his dress is probably similar to
a store clerk of that time. I read the
story once without looking at the picture and there wasn’t as much depth. When the picture was added, details were more
apparent and easier to visualize. There
isn’t very much going on in the picture, but small details can be selected from
it. The picture also acts as an
introduction for other stories of Hank further on in the book.
Overall, I feel
that the pictures added meaning to the story.
Authors can describe people clearly, but having the picture really adds
another perspective. Silko was strategic
with the choice of pictures. The time
period and aspect that was trying to be portrayed was taken into account. Analyzing the picture shows that it
encompasses more than what is first perceived.
Connections between the picture and text seem to increase the more they
are examined. Something as small as the
clothing they are wearing can help describe the person or story. A person wearing an apron seems normal, but
adding it into a story with them cooking makes the connection. Then further parts of the story describing
them grinding the red chili makes it come to life. The placement of the photo is also another key
point. Not only does it break the text
up physically, but shows the picture at the right time. It creates a flow that helps move the reader
along. Silko did this well throughout
the book and made it an enjoyable read.
This doesn't really follow the prompt. You are commenting on the pictures, and there's nothing wrong with the commentary as such - there are details which you touch on that deserve attention. But there isn't anything resembling an argument here. How should we read "Storyteller" (the story) or "Lullayby" differently because of how you have interpreted the images? What can you do with them to help us understand the text in a way we couldn't understand it without the images? Your commentary on the images is very general, and then you don't really draw any conclusions. Always when writing an essay you need to be able to show the reader why it *matters* that you have chosen your focus - that isn't clear here.
ReplyDelete