In the beginning of
Vertigo, there is a brief history of the United States that shows a vast amount
of progress and positive changes occurring. The meaning of this brief history
of America presented in ‘1929’ is to show how far the country had come and how
much was accomplished in the time before everything changed during the
depression. There are sharp differences
between the ‘1929’ chapter and the chapters that follow, but at the end of the
‘1929’ chapter there is warnings of unfortunate events to come. When the chapter is coming to an end there is
a rainstorm that ruins the carnival for many people. This foreshadowing tells a little about the
pain and suffering that is in the chapters ahead for the three main characters,
the boy, the girl, and the gentleman.
Throughout the chapter with the brief history
there are many images of men working, building great skyscrapers, constructing
railroads, and exploring new areas. The many pictures of the great work showed
strong, very fit men doing the work; whereas, many of the men in the later
chapters were shown to be small, thin figures.
The differences between the men used, showed a strong correlation
between the health of the country and the health of the workingman.
The man telling the brief history at
the graduation ceremony spoke of all the good that can come when you work hard
and dedicate yourself to a higher purpose.
Like the transformation of the workingman doing masonry at first and
then the skyscrapers being erected by the end of the history, with a similar
looking workingman. This was intended to
inspire the young audience to go out into the world and work hard so one day
they could be part of a better country than the one they are walking into. The
inspiration is quickly turned into desperation, which is highlighted when the
boy steals from the man who wrecked his car over a cliff. This shows a drastic
change in the once innocent boy that has been turned into a desperate man by
the hard and unforgiving world he found shortly after his graduation. His
desperation leads him planning to mug a man in an alley, and eventually selling
his blood to the old gentleman when he has no other options.
At a further look, the man telling
the history also talks about fighting that took place, and immediately after
the war picture there is a page with men traveling out west, and exploring new
lands. This shows that even if there is war and fighting there can be a
positive outcome. Later in the book there is also more fighting and war with
the workers and the National Guard with an outcome that is not as prosperous as
in the brief history. When the old
gentleman ordered the National Guard in, there is intense fighting between them
and the rioters, except these pictures of the fighting are more graphic and are
shown to be more harmful than the ones shown in the history.
Furthermore,
the old man’s health is suffering greatly after the riots because of the
business problems he may be having or the remorse he has for calling in the
National Guard. Regardless of the
reason, this is a far different picture after the prosperity shown after the
fighting in the brief history. Since the
author is an advocate of unions, I think he showed this to say there is
sometimes a good reason to use force and other times it is not beneficial to anyone
involved. He also wanted to portray the old gentleman as a person who does not
care much about people and only about his business earning money, regardless of
what he has to do.
In
conclusion, the brief history is a summary of the ups and downs that a society
will face throughout time. There
sometimes needs be periods of war, despair, and instability before true
progress can be made. In the end the author never reaches the part of progress
for the boy, girl, and the old gentleman, possibly because he did not want to
give his audience false hope. He may not
have known what would be next for the country and he was simply telling the
story as he saw it. There was little hope for the characters, as there may have
been little hope in the country during that time.
I really like the comparison of men’s health in the history versus the story portion; you could definitely cite specific examples and elaborate on how this might be effective as foreshadowing. I also think that you could elaborate on the example of the young man. His downfall could probably be tied in more with the historical sequence, which would really strengthen your argument that they are connected. I think it would be interesting to delve in deeper with the parallels between the history and Depression portions. Perhaps bringing in some of the symbols we spoke about in class would strengthen your argument. For example, talking about the different ways that the star is used in the two sections could be an interesting argument that the author foreshadowed themes or ideas.
ReplyDeleteAs far as what could be cut, I don’t know if all of the second-to-last paragraph really pertains to the argument. The portion about the old gentleman being portrayed negatively should be brought back to draw a parallel in the history section or cut out.
You want to quickly establish an argument which would be interesting or provocative to someone else in the class, someone else who has read the book. Saying that the '1929' chapter foreshadows events ahead is certainly true, but it's also obvious. You want an argument which actually has something to prove.
ReplyDeleteBy the third paragraph, you are focusing on interesting details: "This was intended to inspire the young audience to go out into the world and work hard so one day they could be part of a better country than the one they are walking into. The inspiration is quickly turned into desperation, which is highlighted when the boy steals from the man who wrecked his car over a cliff. This shows a drastic change in the once innocent boy that has been turned into a desperate man by the hard and unforgiving world he found shortly after his graduation." I like this material - you are reading closely, and you clearly get that there are interesting contrasts here between the ideas of 1929 and the harsh reality that follows, but even though it's gotten more interesting I'm not really sure what you're trying to accomplish.
The two paragraphs about violence are both interesting and totally unfocused. Analyzing and making an argument about violence in the book is a good idea; relating the violence of American history to the violence of the union-busting is an excellent idea. You could certainly write an essay about that - but here I have no idea what you're actually trying to *say* about how we get from one form of violence to the other.
Overall: By the conclusion, it's especially clear that you don't really have an argument. You focus on interesting questions, which is good, but if you revise your first job is to figure out what you're really trying to prove, and then reorganize/rewrite around that.