Argument:
I am arguing
that the combination of nature (our genetic code) and the nurture we receive
(childhood experience) combine together to ultimately shape who we are. More
specifically, Bechdel’s own sexuality is due to the genes given to her by her
father and also from his closeted sexuality directly reflecting on her. Her
sexuality, like other genetic traits is inherited; it is predetermined by her
parents.
Counterargument:
Bechdel’s sexuality is independent
of her genes or her upbringing. It is her own personal trait that has nothing to
do with her father. Sexual preference is not a trait that can be inherited. She
determines her sexual preference and it not due to her father in any way. Or perhaps, her sexuality is related to her
family, but is more complex than just the impact from her father.
So what?:
The reader should care because this
idea ultimately affects everyone. There isn’t a single person who does not have
parents, and even if they are not present in their life the impact they have on
our ultimate disposition and how much control we have over who we are is
fascinating. If there is no way of changing who we are, then is there actually
any such thing as free will? We can control our physical actions, but if we
cannot change the impact from our parents then society is looking at the
dynamic of change in the wrong way. We cannot change who we are, instead we
must deal with what we are given. We in fact cannot do anything we set our
minds to. We can do a subset of things that we are genetically encouraged and
raised to do. The idea that it explicably affects our sexuality is even more interesting
as it can show why there is a different in sexuality. To me the fact that our
sexuality is determined from our parents and upbringing is something most
people don’t think about and is really interesting to research. By using the
research to show the impact on Bechdel, the reader can further understand the
complexity of her relationship with her father, and perhaps the multiple
dimensions of her sexuality.
Possible Introduction:
What role do our
parents play in our lives? The concept of nature vs. nurture deals with the
ideas that an individual is due to their genetic code or the way someone is
raised. However, I believe that more specifically it is a combination of the
two that shape who we are. We are given certain genes that determine certain
aspects of ourselves, but we are also the product of the experiences that shape
us. It is more fascinating that certain, unusual traits can be controlled by
the dichotomy. Fun Home depicts
Bechdel’s childhood events highlighting the strange relationship between
herself and her father. Her father is a closeted homosexual and according to
Bechdel, ultimately ends up committing suicide. Is it a coincidence that Bechdel
ends up being gay? On the contrary, it may actually predetermined based off of
her father’s sexuality. Throughout Fun
Home, Bechdel depicts herself in a similar, if not mirroring way to her
father to highlight the similarities between them and the influence he has had
on her. Bechdel’s sexuality is due to the genetic predisposition she inherited
from her father, and grows based off of his hidden sexuality.
Basic Outline:
Intro: Sample
above
Body I: Bechdel’s
depiction of herself and her father (showing similarities)
Body II: Research
on “gay gene”
Body III: Nurture
side (research on growing up with gay parents)
Body IV:
Psychological impact of whole childhood on sexuality
Body IV:
Counterargument, sexuality only due to Bechdel herself (research shows
otherwise) or perhaps sexuality due to factors other than just her father
Body V: Bechdel’s
coming out and effect of suicide with father
Conclusion:
Bechdel’s sexuality is in fact due to her father.
Bibliography
Bechdel,
Alison. Fun Home: A Family Tragicomic. First
Mariner Books, 2006. Print.
This source is the class text that my essay revolves around.
I plan to use certain quotes in Bechdel’s text that describe her father to show
how she portrays similarities between herself and her father. I also plan to
compare her drawings of herself and her father to show that she in fact feels a
part of herself is clearly based off of her father.
Goldberg, Abbie E. Lesbian and gay parents and their children:
Research on the family life cycle. 2010. Web. http://search.proquest.com/publicationissue/674B910088974ADEPQ/$5bqueryType$3dpubbrowseDescending:OS$3b+sortType$3dDateDesc$3b+searchTerms$3d$5b$3cAND$7cpubid:326203$3e$5d$3b+searchParameters$3d$7bchunkSize$3d20,+instance$3dprod.academic$7d$3b+metaData$3d$7bUsageSearchMode$3dPublication,+publication.search.filter$3d2010,+dbselections$3darts$7cbusiness$7cscience$7cdissertations$7cnews$7cliterature$7chealth$7chistory$7csocialsciences$7c10000187,+SEARCH_ID_TIMESTAMP$3d1416075929025,+publication.name$3dLesbian+and+gay+parents+and+their+children:+Research+on+the+family+life+cycle.$7d$5d/1/Lesbian+and+gay+parents+and+their+children:+Research+on+the+family+life+cycle./02010Y01Y01$232010?accountid=14709
This source discusses recent studies on the effects of
growing up with gay parents. I am planning on using the data with Fun Home to show the predisposition for
being gay if one’s parents are, even if is the parent is a closeted homosexual,
as in Bechdel’s situation.
Goldhaber, Gale. The Nature-Nurture Debates: Bridging the
Gap. Cambridge University Press, 2012. Print.
This source couples nature and nurture together to show that
it not one or the other, but rather both that combine together to influence
people. He references the importance of understanding the reason we are the way
we are and why it matters. I plan to use it to highlight the “so what” question
to show it is important to understand how we develop and that some traits
(sexuality specifically) can be influenced the same way as more typical traits
such as temperament.
Letourneau, Nicole and Joschko,
Justin. Scientific Parenting: What Science
Reveals About Parental Influence. 2013. Web.
This source shows a variety of childhood experiences and how
they are scientifically proven to affect the child in the situation. There are
examples of abuse, struggling parents, and other problems that Bechdel
experienced as a child. I plan to use it with the psychological side of her
sexuality.
Pool, Robert.
“Evidence for Homosexuality Gene.” Science.
Vol 261, July 16, 1993. Published by The
American Association for the Advancement of Science. Web. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2881553
This source is an article describing one of the first
studies that show the “homosexual gene” in homosexual individuals. It is proof
that there are many things that we cannot overcome from our parents’
combination of genes to make our own. It shows that there is at some level a
genetic predisposition for our sexuality much like our race, eye color, or hair
color. I plan to use the research data to show that genetically, Bechdel has a
predisposition of being gay.
Steen, R.
Grant. DNA and Destiny: Nature and
Nurture in Human Behavior. Plenum Press, 1996. Print.
This source discusses many studies on the traits of
individuals and the likeliness of them being genetic traits passed on. One part
specifically focuses on the chances of passing down the “gay gene” through
reproduction. I plan to use this both in my argument that Bechdel’s sexuality
is due to her father and in my counterargument that it is her own personal
preference independent of her father’s sexuality.
This is an interesting area to explore, and is vastly more focused than I had expected so early, so that's great! There's a little more work to be done focusing this. You don't necessarily need to work very hard to show why it matters that certain characteristics, including our sexual orientation, are shaped by forces and influences totally out of our control. But this is such a big topic that taming/focusing will be your challenge. You're well underway by focusing on nature/nurture specifically with Bechdel, but the topic is still so big that it's easy to focus insufficiently.
ReplyDeleteSo here's a foundational question. Are you after a better understanding of Bechdel through the use of science? If so, how does that change our understanding of the book, especially as a work of art? Or are you interested in using Bechdel to illustrate a larger point about human behavior - and if so, toward what end? I think either one is fine (the first is easier to focus than the second), but that answering that question will help lead you to an even sharper focus, where you can really articulate what you're trying to show about us, Bechdel or both.