Throughout the second section of House of Leaves, the text started to
rearrange in a variety of different ways. Although they do not make any sense
to me, I found that Danielewski incorporated these visual text changes into
patterns. These patterns are then related to the actual information he presents
to us in the text. On pages 119 to 145, Danielewski uses squares to incorporate
text within text. The blue outline of the squares distinguishes it from the
rest of the page. It is also important to note that on the left side of the
page, the words within the square are written backwards and on the right side,
they are written in a normal left to right fashion. This signifies a mirroring
action, although the words are not the same, nor do they match up with one
another. This happens on every page in this section. I also noticed a recurring
pattern of an endless list of names on the side footnote panels. The left side
of the page presented the names normally, whereas the right side showed them
upside down. A second pattern I noticed was the use of fragmented words on
pages 194 to 205 and again on pages 217 to 238. The majority of the page was
left blank, with a few words on each.
I believe the overall pattern theme
correlates to Navidson’s three short, three long shot pattern. On page 102, it
is stated Tasha K. Wheelston discovered Navidson’s pattern of editing. He
sequenced his footage into a very specific cadence. Wheelston uses Navidson’s
SOS as an example. She found that Navidson had specifically incorporated the
film roll into the sequence. He alternates between three shots with short
durations and three shots with longer durations. Going further into patterns, in
chapter IX, the very first text we see is “laboriosus exitus domus” in Latin,
translated as, “the house difficult of exit.” The house has been labeled as a
maze and/or a labyrinth and has been related to the story of King Minos and the
Minotaur’s labyrinth. “So Daedalus designed his winding maze;/ And as one
entered it, only a wary mind/ Could find an exit to the world again-/ Such was
the cleverness of that strange arbour” (115). Much like with the Minotaur, no
one ever sees the house’s labyrinth in its entirety and the comprehension of
its intricacies must always be derived from within. Even when Holloway and his
team kicked down the walls in their explorations, it only just led to another
border to another interior (119). Every room, corridor and staircase they found
all had specific patterns of arrangement. Even the changes and shifts of these
were patterned.
I think this relates to the
constant shifting of the text. It seems as though the story goes through
phases, where each section presents a different pattern. It is also said that
the labyrinth is still in fact a house. On page 128, Jed is seen “fist rapping”
against the floor. This is related back to the same exact sound and timbre as
the knocks heard pages earlier back in the living room. This is one way that
the text represents a labyrinth. Furthermore, on page 136, the story of Hudson
and his attempt to find the Northwest Passage is told. He head across the
arctic waters and ended up at the Hudson Bay. His men were described as being
in “a labyrinth without end.” Hudson, his son and seven others were forced into
a shallop without food and water, and were never heard from again. They were
lost in the labyrinth. This is a clear parallel to Holloway and his men, Jed
and Wax. They go on a dangerous exploration where they did not take enough
provisions to last the duration of their trip and although they made all
efforts to keep track of their path, their efforts failed. Wax ended up getting
clawed at and his leg was bleeding profusely. “Holloway found himself with men,
who, short of reserves and faith, insisted on turning back.” The one
difference, however, is that Holloway went willingly into the labyrinth,
whereas Hudson did not. On page 168, Danielewski writes, “Unlike the real world, Navidson’s journey
into the house is not just figuratively but literally shortened.” This is
reflective of how the words on pages 194 to 205 and 217 to 238 are shortened
and choppy. On page 191, they find Jed with “ashen features as he faces what he
has come to believe is his final moment.” This is the same scene where Jed and
Wax were at a standstill due to Wax’s injury. The growling noise was closing
around them and then they heard the door being opened. Danielewski, by not
telling us what comes through the door, leads us to believe it is the creature
lurking in the dark halls. Later on, through the perspective of Navidson and
his rescue team, it is revealed that it is them that walks through to door to
see Was and Jed in the hallway.
Furthermore, chapter X states that “every house
is an architecturally structured ‘path’: the specific possibilities of movement
and the drives toward movement as one proceeds from the entrance through the
sequence of spatial entities have been pre-determined by the architectural
structuring of that space and one experiences the space accordingly.” Through
this, I believe that Danielewski has some method to his pattern madness,
although I personally have not discovered it yet. Some critics believe the house’s
mutations reflect the psychology of anyone who enters it. “The house, the
halls, and the rooms all become the self – collapsing, expanding, tilting,
closing, but always in perfect relation to the mental state of the individual.”
Maybe the book is supposed to be different for each reader, where his or her psychological
states and assumptions give the book a different meaning.
Through all of the evidence seen
above, I believe the book itself is a labyrinth. It is telling a story about a
labyrinth, the text on the pages is a labyrinth - with a constant change of
storyline switch ups with the footnotes and the actual story - and the switch
up of ways in which Danielewski presents the texts with squares, spacing and
blank spaces. I also think that the book
is a labyrinth in which readers must figure out, through the interpretation of
the patterns presented to them. The constant switch of patterns is parallel to
the constant changes within the house. The patterns of time and the eventual connections
that the story makes also prove this belief.
You seem to be indicating that your basic insight is that the text is a labyrinth, like the house. This is a pretty basic insight, not in itself worth pursuing - the devil is in the details, though. That is, there might be *specific* things to be said about how and why it is a labyrinth that are very much worth exploring.
ReplyDeleteThe insight that the endlessly shifting text corresponds with the physical shifts in the house itself has a lot going for it. Ideally I would have liked that as your starting point, and for you to have focused on direct relationships between the shifting text and the shifting maze. You do this well in several places within your essay - for instance, "On page 168, Danielewski writes, “Unlike the real world, Navidson’s journey into the house is not just figuratively but literally shortened.” This is reflective of how the words on pages 194 to 205 and 217 to 238 are shortened and choppy. "
You do some analysis, then, of what the details of the labyrinth's form. I would have liked you to focus on this kind of thing - maybe just a few details - and think harder about what these details mean. Your specifics are good, but this essay is nonetheless scattered, and could do with a more focused argument.