Over
the course of Chris Ware’s Jimmy Corrigan, we find many recognizable troupes
that comics across the world follow. This ranges from the panel format to text
boxes to the easy-to-understand art the makes the story that much more
intriguing in its complexities. The story that Ware is trying to tell over the
course of the first half of the book is one of the struggles, fears, and
attempts at success that Jimmy Corrigan faces over his seemingly mediocre
middle-American life.
How
are comics, in particular Jimmy Corrigan, understood, however? Without the
previous attempts at making comics something that the everyday person could
interact with and comprehend, Jimmy Corrigan would have been but a series of images
that we would struggle to understand. Ware’s predecessors, such as Peanuts
creator Charles Schulz, helped in creating a society that could read and
understand images in sequence, and as such, Schulz is nearly directly
responsible for Ware’s ability for the general public to understand the story
he is attempting to express.
In
the Peanuts comics, Schulz tells a story within a limited space. This space
creates a need for a balance between words and images; if there are too many
words, the image loses some of its impact because it is allotted less space. If
the text is too short, the meaning behind the image or images can be lost.
Although Schulz may not have created this style himself, he is one of the
individuals who benefitted from it, perfected it, and kept it alive. Although
space was less of a limitation to Ware, he owes the overall organizational
structure of his comics, in this case Jimmy Corrigan, to Schulz and his
contemporaries.
If
we try to look deeper into Ware’s work through the lens of Schulz’s comics, we
find that many of his stories are extended through his use of panel location.
If Ware would have used the typical composition that is used by cartoonists
such as Schulz, Jimmy Corrigan might have been more approachable, and yet it
would not have had the deep meanings it currently contains through its interesting
use of organization.
The
use of imagination is something that makes Ware’s Jimmy Corrigan easier to
understand when looked at in the same way as in the Peanuts comics. For
example, Snoopy sometimes imagines himself flying the Red Baron through the
skies, with the wind in his face, until finally reality hits and he realizes
that he’s actually stuck on the ground. Snoopy believes that he was actually
flying, although we as an audience know that he was not. In the same way, Jimmy
has the thoughts of himself as the robot falling down the steps. Because of
this dream, he uses a crutch for an extended period of time. He thinks that his
visions are real, although they are merely figments of his imagination
Peanuts
comments revolve around a continuous story that can be expressed through 4
separate panels for different times; one day, there may be a story about the
group going to visit the Great Pumpkin (Schulz) . The next day, there could be
a scene at the pumpkin patch. Although the stories can be presented in
chronological order, they do not have to be viewed at the same time to make
sense. This is in opposition to Jimmy Corrigan, where many of the happenings
only make sense within the context of the entire book. Although there are
inevitably some instances in the book that could be taken out of context and
turned into a “short form”, 4-panel comic, as Schulz does, most of what Ward
has drawn must be read and understood as literature would be- the past parts of
the story all matter in deciphering of the current location.
The
themes displayed throughout Jimmy Corrigan are much more mature than what is
offered in the Peanuts. In Schulz’s comics, the characters are (mostly)
children, living out their lives in as innocent a way as possible. Their
problems consist of juvenile things like love (Snoopy’s crush on Lucy, for
example), sports (the many times that Linus pulls a football from someone
trying to kick it), and school. They have obstacles to overcome, for sure, but
as a group they almost always manage to overcome the things that they set out
to accomplish. In Jimmy Corrigan, however, youth is replaced with ignorance and
habit; although we can assume that Jimmy has some mental deficiencies, the
overall feel and themes of the comics, as created by Ware, are darker. Jimmy’s
dreams involve hurt, pain, and death (such as that of him having to shoot the
horse). He is lost and stuck in the same job, attached to his mother although
he is an adult, and overall he seems to be unable to live on his own.
Without
the influence of Schulz’s Charlie Brown character, could Jimmy Corrigan have
existed? The two fictional beings are similar in many ways, from their social
awkwardness to their shy demeanors. Although characters with this persona
existed before Charlie Brown, both in the real world and in the world of
comics, the mold of the shy, inward, and awkward individual was better
understood at the time Ware wrote the book than it was in the 60s when Peanuts
began. As a reader, we understand many of Jimmy’s interactions because we have
seen similar situations as we have grown up, be it in characters like Charlie
Brown or something we saw in another form of media.
There
are a few more specific comparisons that can be drawn between Peanuts comics
and Jimmy Corrigan. One that I found to be specifically similar was released on
September 13th, 1966. In it, Linus and Charlie Brown are talking
about a note that Linus’ mother left in his lunch. He reads the lengthy note to
Charlie, and it takes up more than half of the two strips in which he is
reading it. It’s funny, wordy, and it goes too far, almost like the
introduction to Jimmy Corrigan that we find inside the front cover. Both texts
almost reach a point where we don’t want to read them, but instead, we filter through
the blocks of text to find humor. This was not done often in the Peanuts
comics; as mentioned previously, there was usually a great amount of balance
within the comics. By throwing this balance off, the viewer is likely to pay
more attention to the text.
Balance
is also the reason we are more likely to read the very first page of Jimmy
Corrigan. The cover’s text is twisted in different ways and filled with interesting
images that we are not used to seeing in a comic. We see lines separating
paragraphs that run from left to right and then from top to bottom, an image of
a mouse (or cat, potentially) hitting a cat (or, maybe, a mouse) on its head
with what looks to be a hammer. We then see a gigantic chart trying to explain
the workings of a comic to us.
The
graph on the inside cover draws huge comparisons to Peanuts and how we
understand comics in general. We learn,
when we are young, what a rat looks like, what a cat looks like, and how motion
works. The simplistic drawing in the huge circle on the first actual page of
Jimmy Corrigan shows an image, and the smaller boxes and circles and line serve
as a means to understanding it; or, rather, they serve as a way to understand
why we understand what is happening. We know, for instance, that a separate
panel means a change in time, that there is a sound when a hammer hits a
cartoon head, and that an eyebrow, tilted toward the middle of the face,
denotes anger. We would not be as accustomed to these tropes, however, if not
for things like the Peanuts conditioning us from a young age.
Schulz
helped in making the 4-panel format popular. Because of his contributions, we
are able to understand action within a series of drawings. Jimmy Corrigan,
viewed through the lens of Peanuts comics, is easier to understand than it
would be had characters like Charlie Brown and Snoopy never existed. The
actions, organization, and stories presented in the Peanuts strips are integral
in forming a basis of understanding within the entire culture that reads them,
which allows for more complex levels of understanding in Ware’s Jimmy Corrigan.
Works Cited
Schulz, Charles.
"Peanuts." Peanuts Comic Strips. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Nov.
2014.
Ware, Chris. Jimmy
Corrigan: The Smartest Kid On Earth. New York: Pantheon, 2000. Print.
This essay is dangerously general from beginning to end. You say next to nothing about Jimmy Corrigan and the vital details of it, beyond some thoughts on the introduction. This was interesting, thought: “In Jimmy Corrigan, however, youth is replaced with ignorance and habit; although we can assume that Jimmy has some mental deficiencies, the overall feel and themes of the comics, as created by Ware, are darker.” The issue with it is that there is a darkness in the youth of Charlie Brown, too, when you pay attention to the early comics of the 50s & 60s especially, as we discussed in class.
ReplyDeleteYou generalize about broad ways in which Schultz influences Ware - take what you say about the imagination, for instance. Imagination plays a role in many art forms, and particularly in many comics. The *details* of Shultz’s influences on Ware are tough to explain, but much more important. What about how Charlie Brown is depicted, vs. how Jimmy Corrigan is? What about the focus on artistic minimalism in the Peanuts? How does Ware’s *style* build upon and then deviate from his influences?
You say so little about Ware, and write so generally about Shultz, that there isn’t much really here. To put it the shortest way possible: how does this essay influence our interpretation of Jimmy Corrigan? I can’t see how it does in any way, because it doesn’t engage with any details of the book, nor any details of how Schultz’ influence *matters* to it. Also note the absence of research from your argument.