Jimmy Corrigan, the
Smartest Kid on Earth, despite being a comic with a simple art style and concise
writing, can be very difficult to read and understand. Because the seemingly
simple story is so challenging, some “General Instructions” are printed on the
inside of the cover. In contrast to the book itself, these instructions are
incredibly wordy, using complex vocabulary and a condescending tone as if to suggest
insult to the reader’s intelligence for not understanding basic comics. But
even with the mocking tone of the “General Instructions”, they can still be
useful in understanding the comic itself by mirroring the unreliability and hypocrisy
that shows up.
There is one passage at
the end of the instructions, “New Pictorial Language Makes Marks: Good for
Showing Stuff, Leaving out Big Words” that reveals how the instructions can
relate to the comic. Right in the title, one can see the hypocrisy in “Leaving
out Big Words”, as the instructions are simply full of them. But at the same
time there is a sincerity to that title, as the comic itself lacks many large
words and strives for pictorial explanation.
One quote, in
particular, stands out in the passage. “’CSA is here to stay,’ remarks a
well-known and highly-decorated researcher of popular culture, ‘and all we can
do is get ready. People can hardly form sentences that make any sense anymore;
they’re making nouns into verbs, and acronyming words out of the first letters
of a lot of other words, and using words wrong all the time to mean things they
don’t. So I guess little pictures are about the only way we’re going to be able
to tell stuff in the future, since most anybody can understand them.’” That
passage is just dripping with mockery. All of the ‘sins’ people are making in
forming sentences happen in the instructions, all in that section, a few even
within the same sentence that condemns them. The attribution of the quote to a vague,
well-known researcher also hints at its insincerity. There is strong suggestion
here that the narrator might be a little unreliable.
The essay “Comics
Architecture, Multidimensionality, and Time: Chris Ware's Jimmy Corrigan: The
Smartest Kid on Earth” by Thomas Bredehoft goes into detail about the other
instructions and activities found throughout the book. But even with his
analysis of other parts of the book, he ties them in to the general
instructions. He says, ”and since (as
will be seen below) the typeset notes and instructions on page 206 are
explicitly presented as instructions and commentary directed towards the reader
of Jimmy Corrigan, they are probably to be interpreted as being presented in
the voice of the narrator, as are the "General Instructions"
appearing on the front endpapers of the hardback edition.”(Bredelhoft)
One place in the book
where you can see the unreliability of the ‘narration’ would be in Jimmy’s
first major dream sequence. It slips from the waking world to the dreaming so
seamlessly that the reader is not entirely sure when the transition takes
place. Well, it’s clear that it is not reality once he turns into a robot, but
before that there is no dialog or narration to tell what is happening. In the
book, dreams and daydreams are shown without any differentiation to reality,
and because many of them play out as fairly plausible actions, the reader may
be left confused as to what is dream and what actually happens. This dream,
however, starts as one of the more obviously fantastic ones that are easy to
differentiate.
There is a page
entirely without words at all, telling the story entirely through pictures. The
reader sees the robot looking around and off a ledge, a large picture in the
middle reveals that the robot is on an airship, and the robot then appears to
extend its eyepiece where it snakes down from the airship and up to a window.
This entire section is given without a single letter on the page. That use of
little pictures to tell ‘stuff’ happens throughout the entire comic. There are
lots of pages where not a word is spoken, written, or otherwise even drawn in
the background, yet the comic gets by without the complicated vocabulary seen
in the instruction. The passage in the general instructions speaks of using
images over words, and here we see a great example of how that can work really
well. Even though the instructions are hypocritical, they do have some truths,
but it is up to the reader to figure out what is real and what isn’t.
After that there is a
dream scene where the robot is nothing more than a head. This robot is seen
waking up and receiving a crutch as a present. This is notable because after
the dreams, Jimmy is shown to have an injured leg, but at no point is it really
shown how he injures it. As seen in the ‘transitions’ to and from dreams, there
is nothing really showing the difference between the two. As this is one of the
crazier, more obviously dreamlike scenes, it is even more notable that Ware
chooses here to insert something real. So that might leave the reader
questioning whether any part of the ‘dream’ is real or even how much of the
‘waking world’ is real. How much do dreams and reality blend?
At one point in his
essay Bredelhoft talks about the page where the reader can supposedly cut out
and assemble a model of the old Corrigan Family home. But he points out, “Because
the cut-outs appear on both sides of a single leaf of the book, it is actually
impossible to cut them out and build them, at least without employing some
method of reproduction or cutting up two copies of the book.”(Bredelhoft) The
words of those instructions claim, “Given the generally intuitive level of the
task, no detailed directions are provided,” but then one finds that the task
itself is actually impossible. There is this promise that the reader can create
an actual, physical, real-life model, but with only one copy of the book that
is nothing more than hypocrisy and imagination. The hypocrisy of the
instructions extends to other areas of the comic, such as how the Columbian
Exposition promised a bright future full of innovation, but the world turned
out very different than was envisioned, such as the fact that Jimmy Corrigan
really isn’t the smartest kid on earth, or such as whenever characters criticize
others’ parenting techniques, love lives, or general social skills yet are
lacking in those areas themselves.
The comic is very similar
to the general instructions, where parts of them are joking and parts of them
are serious, parts are real and parts are not. There is nothing to tell the
reader which parts are which and the two parts even blend together at points.
The narration is somewhat unreliable, though in the instructions it’s because
it is so verbose while in the comic it’s because it is so absent. Finally, both
the general instructions and certain scenes of the actual comic exhibit areas
of hypocrisy. Even if the “General Instructions” don’t directly tell one how to
understand the comic, they mirror the comic in such a way that the
understanding is shown, not written.
And why does Ware do
this with the general instructions? The instructions were added when the comic
was put together in a single book so that they could add to the book and aide
the reader. Instructions could act as training wheels, displaying characteristics
of the comic in far blunter ways so that the reader is prepared for them later
on and perhaps feels less confused by more unorthodox storytelling techniques. Given
that the story was originally serialized in a newspaper and already read by
many, the instructions could also have been added to point out some of the more
subtle, yet very important, reoccurring themes that people may have missed
without this bluntness. Questioning reality, unreliability, and hypocrisy all
show up again and again throughout Jimmy Corrigan, and the General Instructions
place them right in front so the reader is conditioned to notice them.
Bredelhoft,
Thomas A. “Comics Architecture, Multidimensionality, and Time: Chris Ware's
Jimmy Corrigan: The Smartest Kid on Earth” Purdue
Research Foundation, MFS Modern Fiction Studies 52.4 (2006): 869-890. Project Muse. Web. 3 November. 2014
Ware,
Chris. Jimmy Corrigan, the Smartest Kid
on Earth. New York City: Pantheon Books, 2000. Print.
Your argument is fine, but it probably would have been better to focus on unreliability *or* hypocrisy and develop the argument from there.
ReplyDeleteI would have liked better transitions when moving to and from your research, and when moving between the themes of hypocrisy and unreliability. Clarify how everything fits together! Your observations are sound, but it’s not easy to tell what we should *do* with them.
“The passage in the general instructions speaks of using images over words, and here we see a great example of how that can work really well. Even though the instructions are hypocritical, they do have some truths, but it is up to the reader to figure out what is real and what isn’t.” -- does the hypocrisy have a purpose? Are the images themselves pure and trustworthy, or are they hypocritical in their own way?
In the second to last paragraph, I sense a kind of abdication: “The narration is somewhat unreliable, though in the instructions it’s because it is so verbose while in the comic it’s because it is so absent. Finally, both the general instructions and certain scenes of the actual comic exhibit areas of hypocrisy.” You are repeating an important point which you have demonstrated at some length - but you are stopping at the point of making an important observation, rather than clarifying the importance of that observation to the text or, at least, by exploring the relationship between the hypocrisy and unreliability. What is the relationship between the two concepts? Your conclusion is more of a refusal to really make a coherent argument out of your observations than it is an argument.