Robert Crumb is
one of the most famous artists of the modern age. He is most famous for his
comic books, in fact he founded Zap
Comix, which basically invented underground comics. His entire life he was
a comic book lover and could not find anything else to do other than draw. Much
of what people think of him comes from his highly perverse and anti-culture
drawings.
The film Crumb was a documentary of Robert Crumb’s life which was released
in 1994 and directed by Terry Ziwigoff. The documentary used interviews of
Robert, his two brothers, several girlfriends, his wife and some art experts all
to reveal a lot about the true Robert Crumb. While the film showed that Robert
was the only brother of the three that was not diagnosed with a mental illness,
it was made obvious that was very crucial to his development of an artist and
man.
When
Crumb wrote Genesis it was unique per
se because it took four years of painstaking work and research, while most of
his other work, he claims in an interview with Francoise Mouly, was on a whim
from sketchbook to a comic book. Crumb was also much more experienced when
doing this project. The work he put in was to find accurate translations,
accurate clothing and tools all to do a literal translation of Genesis. The literal translation is
probably more shocking than a spoof, since many would assume Crumb would do a
spoof and to see the Book of Genesis in such a literal light from an artist
like Crumb can take people by surprise. Not only because of how unexpected but
also because of how real and dark the bible is.
Using
the realness and the darkness and the literal use of words to images, Robert
Crumb was able to tell a story about his life through subtle images and tells.
His earlier work is all from his id and highly sexual, while this work seems
much more conscious and real. In his interview, Robert Crumb could find no
explanation as to why he would draw those shocking drawings, such as interfamily
sex, but with Genesis it was a
deliberate attempt to literally draw out the book of Genesis. All this work
would have never led to where it was in Genesis
if not for his life growing up in the family he did.
The
Crumb family was on the outside a typical fifties family. It was headed by a
military father then there was the mother, three brothers and two daughters. Yet,
on the inside he had a militant father who was very oppressive, an emotional
damaged mother and his two brothers had mental illnesses. While Robert was the
most normal, he was still very much not a normal kid. He was always the
outsider, the “nerd” that drew comics with his older brother and always sought approval.
Robert could find nothing else to do, his constant outlet, both mentally and
sexually was through drawing. His entire life he drained his emotions into art
and sex and most of it done very irrationally and crudely. Then he started the
project of Genesis. In this all his
blind release was put into a very coherent and deliberate outlet of his
emotions and life.
His
life is almost characterized by Jacob, where he must push up great stones to
mark memorials. Each stone being pushed is a stone Robert had to push himself.
Getting through young life in a troubled family, finding his path as an artist,
finding the right woman to be with, getting over the loss of his brother and
finally settling down and owning his family life. Genesis is his way of showing the struggles of early mankind, to
get through being condemned by god and then killed off, to find their way back
into a society, only to be scattered when too powerful, then finding love, and
finally becoming a functioning society.
Crumbs
life and struggles have so many layers that could not fully be covered in the
documentary. Nor, can it even be shown in just one work. He went through so
much and has done so much that through careful analysis of everything and all
the interviews may in fact finally give a full picture. It is still remarkable
that through all he has done he was still able to sit back and write the
coherent fully realized Book of Genesis
Illustrated.
Your essay goes over the similarities and differences between Crumb's life and other works verses Genesis well, and I think a clear contrast was established, especially in your second paragraph. Your opening paragraph doesn't mention Genesis at all though, and since it's an important part of the essay I think your thesis should clearly indicate that the essay will relate this work specifically to Crumbs life. The third paragraph largely supports the one before it and the details could be integrated into that paragraph rather than composing their own.
ReplyDeleteLater on, you go into a lot of details of Crumb's family life. While it's helpful to establish background, explaining these details should be used more within your argument by connecting them to details in Genesis, like you do in the second-to-last paragraph. Overall, I think more specifics from the illustrations of Genesis should be used, not just the text. Finding a place that Crumb made artistic interpretations and relating that to his life would help support your argument that his family life was a clear influence on his work in Genesis.
The first couple paragraphs don’t do much. Is your thesis really a thesis? “While the film showed that Robert was the only brother of the three that was not diagnosed with a mental illness, it was made obvious that was very crucial to his development of an artist and man.” For this to really be an argument, you’d need to assert not just this general point, but something about *how* this knowledge helps us understand *Genesis*.
ReplyDelete“The literal translation is probably more shocking than a spoof, since many would assume Crumb would do a spoof and to see the Book of Genesis in such a literal light from an artist like Crumb can take people by surprise.” -- That’s a good line, although it doesn’t accomplish much in isolation - this is maybe an opportunity to examine a moment when he turns away from the possibility of the spoof. Is there a connection here between the mental illness which interests you in the first paragraph and the literalism you emphasize in the 2nd paragraph?
“His life is almost characterized by Jacob, where he must push up great stones to mark memorials. Each stone being pushed is a stone Robert had to push himself.” Now here’s the challenge. Could you make this into a convincing argument? It’s not easy, but it has potential.
Point 1: He does clearly *choose* to put great emphasis on the pillars
Point 2: He is deeply interested in inter-family strife, which is a key topic in his own life and in Genesis
Question: Could one argue that the pillars relate directly to inter-family strife?
Question: Is there direct evidence that his portrayal of Jacob is a metaphor for his own life? I think it’s a great idea (Charles as Esau? His father as Isaac, or maybe better as Abraham sacrificing Isaac?), but at this stage, it’s an interesting speculation. You need to convince us.
Note: Even if if this isn’t convincing yet, it is in many ways your best work. The ideas are great, the writing is clear and interesting - it just needs to be more of an argument.
Ellen's second paragraph is important - obviously that's advice you need to follow if this is going to be a convincing argument.