Regardless of the nature of Robert Crumb’s prior works, he
presents a faithful rendition of the Book of Genesis, carried out in a manner
which illustrates the Book of Genesis into images which are revealing, as well
as brutally honest. With any visual medium, artistic presence is
inevitable, if not expected, and is seen through the book’s interpretation of
God’s will and the duality of his nature regarding the humans he had created.
Throughout the first few chapters, Crumb remains relatively within
the lines of the biblical representation of Genesis, not taking artistic
liberties concerning the construction of the novels message. However, as
the novel progresses it can be seen through the scenes involving the great
flood, Crumb takes an interesting stance on the meaning and interpretation of
God’s judgement on earth. Even following the Book of Genesis as the
source, how would anyone truly know this stance without postulating
hypotheticals? So it is in these scenes which he develops a certain tone
about his own investigation of the underlying biblical meaning of God’s
demeanor.
One facet presents a beautiful harshness regarding the human race,
imperfect from his first prototypes when Adam and Eve betray his ultimatum
regarding the tree of life in the garden of eden. His growing dissent is
evident early from Cain’s exile, but continues to manifest as he oversees the
evils capable from man as they began to populate the face of the earth.
God’s wrath seems to reach its peak with his regret of mans creation and
decision to eliminate man from the world with the coming of the great flood.
Focusing on only this first exposure, God is seen to be a vengeful deity
capable of mankind's destruction, with little allusion to mercy or forgiveness.
However distraught God was from the vile actions of man, perhaps he
sought to preserve his work including the animals and man who was formed from
his own image. With mankind’s destruction imminent, the formation of the
covenant with Noah shows the second facet of God’s demeanor, one of mercy and
passion. He wishes to preserve justice and godliness on earth, but cannot
allow the hedonistic tendencies and sin of the general mankind to course
through the earth.
The tone of the flood scenes has two sides in nature representing
the duality of God, one of brutalistic wrath and justice, as well as forgiving
and merciful. God took an active role in creating the crisis of mankind,
and then subsequently works to undo the problem he has created by means of an
extinction. The crux of the flood scenes occurs when God shows compassion
in the peak of his rage by reaching out and warning Noah of the coming flood.
Faithfully following the articulated instructions of God, he prepares for
the flood with the construction of his ark and collection of male and female
animal couples. When the flood ascends and it begins to rain for forty
days and nights, God’s wrath is highlighted in the brutal fashion of numerous
illustrated corpses floating to the surface of earth’s abyss. When the
floods descend, like the waning tides, God’s humanistic side is again shown in
his interactions with Noah. God honors his covenant with Noah and his
family, and shows that the flood was a necessary punishment for mankind’s
sin and wickedness, but blesses Noah righteous ways and those who obey God’s
laws.
Noah functions as God’s
instrument to save animal life on earth, but is illustrated by Crumb to show
features of simple mindedness and confusion rather than sacrificial, or that of
a martyr. Crumb intentionally represents Noah as a weathered man with a
slight hunch and a facial expression which seems permanently frozen in
dumbfounded shock while interacting with God. In this sense, Crumb has
created a holy archetype out of a mortal with imperfections, and shows that God
has not completely given up on the human race by entrusting this task to one of
his subjects that was born out of the world of man’s chaos.
I don’t think your intro actually says anything. The 2nd paragraph isn’t much better: “So it is in these scenes which he develops a certain tone about his own investigation of the underlying biblical meaning of God’s demeanor.” -- What is that certain tone? I don’t know what you’re actually saying here.
ReplyDeleteYour description of God’s gathering wrath is ok, but a little long and general. You don’t engage quickly enough with your interest in Crumb’s depiction of God’s wrath & the flood. When you do so, it’s hard for me to see what you’re getting at: “When the flood ascends and it begins to rain for forty days and nights, God’s wrath is highlighted in the brutal fashion of numerous illustrated corpses floating to the surface of earth’s abyss. When the floods descend, like the waning tides, God’s humanistic side is again shown in his interactions with Noah. “
I mean, Crumb *does* show lots of corposes, and that *is* a place where you can say something about his intepretation or commentary. But we’re almost at the end of the essay here, and you haven’t actually said anything clear.
“Crumb intentionally represents Noah as a weathered man with a slight hunch and a facial expression which seems permanently frozen in dumbfounded shock while interacting with God. “ -- that’s the start of something. I agree that Crumb’s depiction of Noah is very interesting and worth exploring. But you don’t actually say anything about it - you are noting it, not analyzing it or putting it in context.
Overall: You mostly summarize Genesis itself. You do tack on some notes about Crumb’s depiction, but you don’t come close to making an argument from it.
I think looking at the details of Crumbs scenes, will help you better convey what is occurring and why God's wrath and the flood are so impotent. I think you picked a good topic to discuss but it is very surface level. Try to look at the details and how he trying to convey god's wrath.
ReplyDelete