While reading Crumb’s, The Book of Genesis, it is hard to miss
his interpretations of how people looked and in particular how women
looked. He was very detail orientated
when drawing women and was able to portray them in many different ways, but in
particular he seemed to make a point of showing their sexuality. Even when the women were being shown as
angry, devious, or unpleasant, he still made a point to show the exaggerated
curves of their features. In many cases
they had a very sensual body, while there face was very manly looking.
In the beginning of the
book, when Eve was created from Adam, she was shown to be equal if not a little
greater in size than the man. This was
done by Crumb to show the importance he placed on women during this time and
how they played a large role throughout the book. Also, Crumb portrayed the first woman like
this because it was how he thought the perfect woman should be, and how he
thought God wanted women to look. His first picture of Eve showed how she was a
large voluptuous woman with many appealing attributes, and her face was drawn
with soft features not seen with all women throughout the book.
Furthermore, she could have been
drawn this way to show how appealing the first woman was but she could have
also been portrayed this way because of the female figure that Crumb was
attracted to. He liked full figured
women with these attributes and could have chose to show his own interpretation
of how he thought God made the ideal woman/helped for man, and the wide hips
could have been chosen to show her ability or readiness to bear children. In his mind this is how women should look, so
he made an interpretation of the book to go along with his picture of the ideal
woman, which he continues with throughout the book.
Crumb’s idea of the ideal women
goes along with The Book of Genesis
during chapter 29, when Jacob is more attracted to Rachel, who was said to have
“comely” features instead of her sister Leah, who had the “tender” eyes. Although both women were illustrated by Crumb
as full figured, voluptuous women, this part of Genesis shows how men back then
may have been more attracted to the features that Crumb was more favorable of
in his own life. This could have helped
Crumb lead to his interpretation of women the way he did.
All throughout the book there are
many times were women are fully clothed, yet Crumb still decided to show there
prominent nipples almost poking out of there clothing. He may have done this to show that women were
lustful beings, or he could have simply done so because this is the type of
women he was most interested in. When women are naked he makes a point to try
and draw the readers attention to their breast and nipples. This is not what most people would think
about when they read Genesis, but Crumb chose to show them this way based of
either his own personal taste or it could have been from research Crumb did on
the time period.
There is not an example of overweight or very skinny women in the
book. Crumb chose to make them all as
the sexual, voluptuous type that he felt most interested in. Even during chapter 29 of the book when Jacob
is having children left and right, Crumb chose not to show any of the women as
pregnant. As soon as the baby was shown
being born, the women are back to their voluptuous figure. He did not want to portray them in any other
manner that what was attractive to him, except for changing their facial
figures on various occasions.
Many of the women in the book
have the same body shape and size, but Crumb made a point to show their faces
in different ways depending on the situation the women was in. During the last
part of chapter 25, Rebekah is shown lying with Isaac, and she has soft,
feminine facial features. This was meant to exemplify the beauty of Rebekah,
because only something that beautiful could help Isaac find comfort after the
death of his mother. Later, in chapter 27 Rebekah is shown at one point with a
very masculine face when she is telling her son Jacob to steal the blessing
from his elder brother Esau. This
different representation of Rebekah’s face was used to show how she transformed
into a different person after everything she went through with Isaac and how
she was capable of being deceitful.
In conclusion, Crumb was able to
portray women in many different ways throughout the book, but one body type
remained fairly constant throughout. His
interpretation of women was based off his personal tastes in the female figure.
You mentioned some good points about Crumb's preference on women. I liked when you brought up “comely” features instead of her sister Leah, who had the “tender” eyes. Adding to this would make a better argument instead of going back to Crumb's preferences. The section about Crumb not showing pregnancy was a little weak. I skimmed through the book and found Rebekah and Sarai with large stomachs and showing pregnancy. Although there are alot of pregnancies in the book, maybe talk about why he chose to show these instead of the others.
ReplyDeleteThis reads basically as a set of observations. I think the observations could be relevant to an argument, and I agree that they are fundamentally correct observations (Crumb primarily draws women he would be attracted to; he is attracted to a particular body type; also, he is interested in powerful female bodies). But what do these observations accomplish? To put it another way: is he just randomly doing what he likes (in which case there probably isn't much to say about it) or is he *using* his vision of the ideal human form to accomplish some purpose?
ReplyDeleteOne hint, if you choose to revise: read his endnotes and think about whether they relate to his drawing style. Another hint: consider reading some of his earlier work (keeping in mind that much of it is quite offensive).