The
Human Abstract: Morality, Religion, and Love
A
man, trapped underneath restrictive ropes, seems to be struggling to free
himself; in “The Human Abstract,” a piece in the “Songs of Experience”
collection from William Blake, we see a situation concerning the importance of
religion and the threads that figuratively tie the world together. The poem,
clear as it may seem in its message that there cannot be one thing without its
inverse, is brought to life by the sense of stress that is expressed in the image.
The following paragraphs will serve as a means of understanding what it means to
be moral, what it means to be human, and what the poem, as a whole, is trying
to convey.
The man who resides on the bottom of
the page is perplexed, or maybe angry, that he cannot free himself from the ropes
holding him in place. When looked at within the context of the poem, this might
be a reference to the stranglehold that mortality has over him. “Pity would be
no more, If we did not make somebody Poor,” (SIC) it reads, “And Mercy no more
could be, If all were as happy as we.” The words show that, to feel one thing,
we have to be able to feel the opposite. To know that we are “fortunate”, for
example, we must be able to see what it means to be “unfortunate”. The image at
the bottom of the page is a testament to how this knowledge traps us.
Morality, as defined by the Oxford
dictionary , is “Principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong
or good and bad behavior”. This definition allows us to explore the opposites
that William Blake speaks of in “Songs of Experience”. “And mutual fear brings
peace: Till the selfish loves increase.”
Blake is stating that peace is maintained through a fear of chaos.
Peace, according to Blake and
explained by scholar Robert F. Gleckner, “…depends not on human love but on
human fear and secrecy.” According to Gleckner’s interpretation, this is
because human love is the inverse of what we should expect it to be; it only
shines through because there are things like poverty, hunger, and human
suffering to show us that it is a problem.
At first glance, the image appears
to be predominantly negative. Some further association with the text of the
poem reveals, however, that this may not be the case. The man is on his knees,
which might be a reference to the line that reads “He sits down with holy
fears, And waters the ground with tears: Then Humility takes its root, Underneath
his foot.” (SIC). He is afraid of what it means to be human, he is trapped by
it, and yet he is on his knees because he respects the idea that he has no
control over this fact.
Further research reveals that the
imagery of the tree plays an important role in the understanding of the poem
and what the man appears to be doing. The man is actually a god, the creator of
the material world; “Urizen”, as Blake has named him in past works. In the
image, this god is under the “Tree of Mystery”, and as Gleckner says, this
symbolically “represents the resulting growth of religion and the priesthood
(the Caterpillar and the Fly), feeding on its leaves”. This changes the context of the poem; not
only is it a struggle of good versus evil, it is a contemplation of whether the
growth of religion as a whole has been beneficial to society.
Love is a concept that, although
touched on thematically in the whole of the book, is not expressly mentioned in
“The Human Abstract”. Instead, in this poem, Blake talks about the virtues that
he used to describe the idea of “love” in “Songs of Innocence”- this includes the
virtues of mercy, pity, peace, and love (Gleckner 373). He describes love
as “The human form divine”, which could mean that love is what Urizen, the god
in the image below the poem, is representing. Love, then, is trying to escape
from the reality that is the world and the negative aspects that hold it down.
The third stanza goes
as follows;
He sits down with holy fears,
And waters the ground with tears:
Then Humility takes its root
Underneath his foot.
The first line might figuratively be
the god, Urizen, thinking about the world and the harm that he has seen through
his experiences. He is saddened by everything happening around him, and as
such, the second line could literally be him crying. In the beginning of Blake’s
anthology, his poems are more whimsical and light-hearted; “Songs of Innocence”
flourishes because of its sense of wonder. The darker tone of “Songs of
Experience”, however, is exemplified here. Urizen knows now of the harm that
the virtues expressed earlier – mercy, pity, peace, and love- can cause, and he
is saddened by them.
The humility that Blake speaks of
might refer to the “Tree of Mystery”. Gleckner believes that the tree is
represented differently in this poem than it usually is, and I tend to agree;
in almost all poems before and after “The Human Abstract”, the tree is very
subtle. It is almost never referred to directly in the context of the image,
except for here; the tree itself might be the thing holding Urizen down. The
ropes (or what might possibly be roots with this new information) are holding
him down, enslaving him. The poem expressly states “…Then Humility takes its
root Underneath his foot.” This might literally mean that the struggles related
to understanding, even with experience, are directly caused by the world’s
sense of mystery that the tree represents. (Gleckner 377)
There are rules that must be
followed to be a functioning member of society. The experiences of the man
represented in the image have bogged him down; the world seems to have hurt him.
If the character is Urizen, the god from works done by Blake in the past, then
he has seen more than any human being ever has; his experiences are his crutch.
The entirety of “Songs
of Experience” can be expressed by the final stanza:
The Gods of the earth and sea
Sought thro’ Nature to find this
Tree
But their search was all in vain;
There grows one in the Human Brain
The tree, the overarching (an
understated) theme of the entire collection, is what the strongest beings on
the planet have attempted to understand for eternity. This is the mystery that
defines the planet, and it is a part of being human. This “Tree of Mystery” is
the search for knowledge, and it ties even the mightiest of us down. As
Gleckner eluded to, “The Catterpiller and Fly”- the idea of religion and those
who convey it- use this mystery to engross their audience. The sense of panic
and mystery expressed by this poem is made more subtle throughout the entire
collection, but it does an exemplary job at explaining why bad things happen, even when the answer is
known.
Although the man, Urizen, struggles,
there is hope; the Tree, and its knowledge, resides in the human brain. The
title of the poem, “The Human Abstract”, is the final piece of this puzzle. To
be human is to have ideas, to be unique, and to always exist in a state of
discovery. There will never be a true answer, hence the word “Abstract” being
in the title, but we are always working toward self-improvement. “And Mercy no
more could be, If all were as happy as we…” We know what the problem is, and we
can strive to fix it.
Works Cited
"Definition of Morality in English:." Morality: Definition of Morality in Oxford Dictionary (American English) (US). N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Oct. 2014.
Gleckner, Robert F. "William Blake and the Human Abstract" PMLA, Vol. 76, No. 4 (Sep., 1961), pp. 373-379
I like to see some ambition in a thesis. Yours might be excessive, but if you can a small part of it, I’ll be happy to see it.
ReplyDeleteI like your focus on the paradoxes the poem (poems) encapsulate, and I like your observation, which seems rather central to me, that Urizen looks perplexed. You do a nice job of laying out the overall sense of paradox, difficulty, irony and uncertainty that encompasses Blake’s work. But if Urizen the creator is himself confused by his creation, and doesn’t know how to respond to it, how do we? Is there a higher meaning and unity beyond all of this irony and confusion?
One thing I’d note about the human abstract is that its absence is notable. Your reading is fine, but doesn’t really address why the word itself is absent.
A passing note that I may return to: you use Gleckner as a crutch. It’s productive and useful research - but there is a danger of simply repeating your research, rather than using it to develop your own work. It’s a trap you fall into.
Overall: Your use of Gleckner is both interesting and excessive, but we don’t see what *your* purpose is. Your readings are good, but lack an overall unity. You have a good grape of the role of paradox and aporia in Blake - but what do you want to do with it? This essay shows good scholarship and attention to detail, but an inadequate central argument of your own.