Chris Ware’s Jimmy Corrigan the Smartest Kid on Earth,
can be at first hard to follow and interpret due to its unconventional layout. However, it comes with its own “general
instructions” which serves to verse the reader in how to approach the book as
well as aspects of the technical style required to grasp the comic string
language. This section is littered with
words and descriptions which juxtaposes the later body of the novel which, for
periods of time falls short on textual detail.
Right away these instructions prepare the reader to be able to think
critically about the passage of time and relationship between individual
moments separated by frames. Even panels
placed directly next to each other with mostly identical content can be
different representations of time and space in Jimmy Corrigan.
One
of the striking images from these pre-novel instructions is in section four
titled, “Technical Explanation of the Language, Developing Skills”. It is broken
down by two consecutive panels featuring a cat and mouse. The first panel shows a cartoon mouse lifting
a large hammer over his head, and then in the latter panel hitting the
disembodied head of a cartoon cat with the hammer. Linked with this panel, the instructions
state, “Below are five test questions by which you should be able to determine
whether your understanding of the ‘comic strip’ language is sufficient to
embark” (Ware). Although the panel is
seemingly straightforward in nature, these questions seem to deliberately complicate
the transition between the two panels.
These questions all stress understanding the basic aspect of time and
relationship to past and present by exploring the break between panels, and
what the physical separation of the images can produce. However, the coupled images shown only
function to make sure the reader grasps how the natural flow of time functions
in typical panels by showing just one specific action, the hammer being lifted
to strike the cat’s head. Stressing the
normative in this manner is a way to draw attention to unorthodox relationship
to time the panels within the novel exhibit.
The composition of panels, and the relationship to time between them in Jimmy Corrigan, is unlike any typical
comic representation and is hard to classify by general norms. Now that the reader has been introduced to this
simplistic two-step functionality of time in depth, some of the very first
panels in the novel incite a red-flag reaction which induces further
examination of the composition.
By deconstructing such a
simple scene in a nature, emphasis is placed in how the visual representation
of action and symbols function in the image, as well as helping to understand
transitions and narrative links in the story.
One reoccurring visual element of this in Jimmy Corrigan, is the red bird which appears in scenes which often
link different periods of time or move between a state of Jimmy’s lucid
dreaming and reality. The first
appearance of the red bird occurs on page 6, where it sits upon a branch in
front of two versions of Jimmy Corrigan’s house. The bird appears in multiple
locations in this scene and appears to be the same bird throughout, however the
panels themselves actually show vastly different versions of time. The way the bird in placed in these scenes
creates an interesting paradox about the passage of time. The bird seemingly transitions between the
narrative preface scenes, the house of Jimmy as a young child, into the narratives
present condition of Jimmy’s childhood house, boarded-up, decrepit and
forgotten. Finally we get one last panel
of where the house was before its destruction with no bird present at all,
potentially showing the end of the bird’s existence and by extension Jimmy.
The symbol transition of the
red bird is further used to explore the continuity of time throughout the
novel, but maybe most visually in the scene which transitions from the Battle
of Shiloh to the hospital. In this scenario, the bird actually interacts with
the environment making its actions seem completely continuous through the
panels. The bird picks up a flower branch near the body of the dead solider
from the past, then flies up to a branch in the next panel to overlook the
modern day hospital. The birds shown are inevitably not the same, but yet when
viewing all the panels closely together on the same page, they are intrinsically
connected as the similarity of their actions represents them as singular.
One might extrapolate the
reason for stressing the basic in the general instructions pertains to the fact
that Ware regarded them as unneeded and frivolous. The entire layout is speckled with
back-handed retorts and passive-aggressive tones, and functions in a way similar
to the structure of the novel. That is,
what you are provided on the surface is not always what it seems, but may
require extra thought to comprehend. Ware did not disregard this section in its
impact to the reader and function to the novel, but rather designed it to work
parallel. As the novel may be confusing
in its presentation, the instructions are designed to be completely opposite,
so easy to understand that they may be intellectually insulting. However, they
very subtlety underline important aspects of the novel under a guise which
seems to simply educate on the structure and examination of comics.
“Even panels placed directly next to each other with mostly identical content can be different representations of time and space in Jimmy Corrigan.” -- It’s a clear thesis, which is good, although it’s dangerously close to being just a description rather than an interpretation of the book. We’ll see what you do with it.
ReplyDeleteWhat you’re actually trying to say in the 2nd paragraph is terribly unclear to me. “Stressing the normative in this manner is a way to draw attention to unorthodox relationship to time the panels within the novel exhibit. The composition of panels, and the relationship to time between them in Jimmy Corrigan, is unlike any typical comic representation and is hard to classify by general norms.” -- I don’t exactly disagree in principal, but from your writing I can’t tell what you find to be normative and what you find to be unorthodox within the book. If you were to revise, I’d urge you to use an example (if this is really a critical part of your argument, of course), and possibly even make use of McCloud.
Similarly, you’re very observant where the bird is concerned. Observation is usually the start of an effective argument - but what are you *doing* with this particular observation? How do your goals here connect with the previous material on what is unorthodox? You are quite close, I think, to making important connections in the book - presumably you find the red bird unorthodox and the cat head + hammer to be orthodox, and presumably you have some ideas about why that distinction matters - but there’s so much left unsaid here!
Re: the instructions. You’re right about the insult, and the passive-aggressive character of it. But as such, what does it do?
Your individual observations are so good here - but the whole remains less than the sum of the parts. Observations need to be used in the service of an idea. For instance, if you have an idea about how the passive-aggressive insults should influence our reading of the unorthodox flow of time, that could easily form an argument. But in its current form, this essay is awfully disconnected, despite its virtues.