In William Blake’s Songs of Innocence and of Experience
each poem is written on an illustrated engraving with vibrant colors and
imagery. That bright imagery and use of color interacts with the poems to give
them more meaning than with just the words alone. Sometimes the imagery and
color can completely change how one reads the text that it accompanies. In
fact, many of the poems in Songs of
Innocence can be read with much more experience and many of the poems in Songs of Experience can be read quite
innocently. Their respective places in the book become backward between
innocence and experience. In Songs of
Innocence the poem “The Blossom” can become much darker when read with the
imagery in mind, and in Songs of
Experience “THE FLY” can become much lighter.
Northrop Frye’s work Fearful Symmetry: A Study of William Blake
is often pointed to as one of the most significant studies of the works of William
Blake. The hefty tome contains interpretations of many of Blake’s works,
including some commentary on Songs of
Innocence and of Experience. It delves into Blake’s personal beliefs and
how they strongly permeated throughout his work. Frye mentions, “The same
distinction between a contrary and a negation occurs in Blake’s theory of
ideas. All real things have qualities in them, and qualities always have opposites.
This is particularly true of moral qualities, as every virtue has its
corresponding vice. All ‘good’ men by any standards may be ‘bad’ by other
standards” (191). Blake was all about challenging the ethical standards of the
time and breaking down that black vs white barrier between counterparts. Perhaps
this blending of opposites occurs not just for good and evil, but for innocence
and experience as well.
First, in Songs of Innocence, “The Blossom”
appears to be a lighthearted poem about a couple of birds going about their
lives, but those first impressions wither away when looking more closely. It
becomes a poem about sinister happenings, but those events are explained in a
more simple way, as one might explain to an innocent child.
“The Blossom” is a
short poem. It’s surrounded by an image of really tall, dry grass or a withered
tree of sorts. In some colorations the tree is brown and in others it is bright
orange as though it were on fire. In any case, the image looks hot and dry. In
the upper reaches of the tree there are angles prancing about. One in
particular seems to be wearing clothes and looks to be clutching something tiny
to its chest. The two stanzas feature birds, a merry sparrow and a pretty
robin, both “Under leaves so green”. The titular “Blossom” witnesses each bird
doing things. The blossom sees the sparrow “swift as arrow” seeking its “cradle
narrow”, whereas it hears the robin “sobbing sobbing”. Each stanza also ends
with the line, “Near my Bosom”.
Now, the lines “Under
leaves so green/ A happy blossom” would paint the picture of a thriving tree or
forest with lots of green plant life and a single, happy flower. They are
repeated in both stanzas as they are important to the scene. Looking at the
imagery surrounding the poem, however, the reader might notice a distinct lack
of any green. There is only the dead tree and angels. Perhaps, then, the
blossom that the poem is about is actually sorrow. The mental image of a calm
and peaceful forest is replaced by that of the tree in the image, dead and
burnt.
The fiery blossom looks
upon the birds. The sparrow and robin are described as merry and pretty
respectively, as that is how one might normally describe them. You think of
birds as happy, flying things with beautiful, vibrant feathers.
When it comes to the
sparrow, the blossom “Sees you swift as arrow/ Seek your cradle narrow”.
Without the image, the sparrow quickly looking for its cradle might just be
racing home after a long day to go sleep for the night. A cradle is a place of
rest and being described as narrow might mean it’s hard to find and require
seeking or perhaps the rest is just a small one as the sparrow is clearly full
of energy. On the other hand, if we view the poem as menacing, we might see that
energetic sparrow as more frantic. A cradle is a place of rest, yes, but it is
a place of rest made for infants. The sparrow would have to be swift in seeking
its nest if it has babies at risk of being killed.
The other bird, the
robin, is clearly distraught, even without the picture. The blossom “hears you
sobbing sobbing”. The repetition of the word “sobbing” indicates just how upset
the robin is, which may explain why the line “Pretty Pretty Robin” is also
repeated. It’s as though the narrator is trying to comfort the robin by
assuring it that it is beautiful. It is not initially clear why the robin is so
upset, but the idea that its home is dead or destroyed would really explain the
bird’s distress.
After reading about
each bird, the very last line of each stanza is, “Near my Bosom”. The reader
would normally have to wonder exactly whose bosom the poem is talking about. Is
it just a random witness to the scene, a particularly involved bird enthusiast,
or someone else? The image, however, seems to answer that question quite
clearly. As was mentioned earlier, in the upper flames/branches there are a
bunch of angles. The bosom, then, is a divine one. It either refers to the
breast of the angel looking down or perhaps of God himself. The poems in Songs of Innocence heavily feature
religious imagery and an ever watching, ever caring divine. One could go as far
as to explain the dying of the forest as an act of God and say that the
appearance of the angels is a signal that it is all okay in the large scheme of
things.
“The Blossom” can be
described as a short poem about birds living out their lives under green leaves
with a happy flower witnessing them, or it can be described as a short poem
explaining a minor disaster in a more innocent way, using the divine as a form
of comfort. It all depends on whether you incorporate the image that
accompanies the poem into its meaning. Poetry utilizes connotation and metaphor
so much that illustration can influence how each word is interpreted.
In the other book, Songs of Experience, the poems tend
toward the darker side of life. Whereas in Innocence
they feature God and angels watching and protecting, in Experience they feature God and angels neglecting and abandoning. Innocence has poetry about lambs and
infant joy, but Experience has poetry
about tigers and infant sorrow.
But, just as the first
impressions of “The Blossom” crumble away to show an experienced event, the
first impressions of “THE FLY” melt to reveal a more innocent event. The poem
on its own seems to be about the heartless swatting of an insect and the
carelessness of life, but the imagery that escorts it turns it into more of a
poem about play and those moments in life where you can be carefree.
“THE FLY” is longer
than “The Blossom”. The image on its plate is that of a woman with a young
child’s hands in hers and an older child in the background playing badminton. The
narrator talks of a fly and “Thy summers play”, and then compares themselves to
the fly “For I dance/ And drink & sing”. Both of their fun ends when a
“thoughtless” or “blind” hand brushes them. The fourth stanza also mentions
“thought is life/ …/ And the want/ Of thought is death”.
The words of the poem
extensively feature a fly, but there is not a single insect to be seen in the
picture. All the image depicts is play. The poem talks about swatting a fly,
but the only thing being swatted at in the image is a shuttlecock. Perhaps,
then, the important part of the poem are not the lines about the fly and life
and death, but the lines about summer’s play, the ending of it, and thought as
life and death.
The first stanza
observes that a fly seems to play in the summer until “My thoughtless hand/ Has
brush’d [the play] away.” The narrator uses a fly as a metaphor for themselves,
outright saying, “Am not I/ A fly like thee?/ Or art thou/ A man like me?” They
then explain the metaphor with the third stanza, writing, “For I dance/ and
drink & sing:/ Till some bind hand/ Shall brush my wing.”
Looking back at the
image of the children playing, you can see that the woman has the smaller
child’s arms in her hands. She seems to be leading the child somewhere away.
Perhaps her hand is leading the child away from play, which the child may see
as thoughtless. A child may only want to frolic and engage in “summers play”,
but when this woman comes to end that play the child refers to her as a hand
coming to swat at the fun.
The last two stanzas
may provide a reason for the woman leading the child away. If the woman in the
image is a nurse or schoolteacher, she might be pulling the child inside to
study. The child protests,” If thought is life/ And strength & breath:/ And
the want/ Of thought is death;// Then am I/ A happy fly,/ If I live,/ Or if I
die.” Basically, If knowledge and thought is life and lack thereof is death,
then the child is proclaiming that they don’t care whether they live (learn).
Choosing to read “THE
FLY” in this manner makes it into a somewhat innocent poem. It’s just explained
in a much harsher, more experienced way. Similarly, “The Blossom” can be read
as a somewhat violent and experienced poem being explained in an innocent way. Going
back to Frye, he writes some more specific things about Songs of Innocence and of Experience. Frye states, “The Songs of Experience are satires, but one
of the things they satirize is the state of innocence... Conversely, the Songs of Innocence satirize the state of
experience, as the contrast which they present to it makes its hypocrisies more
obviously shameful. Hence the two sets of lyrics show two contrary states of
the soul, and in their opposition there is a double-edged irony, cutting into
both” (236). Blake uses innocence and experience to comment on each other as
well as themselves. In these two poems one can even read them with either
viewpoint in mind. The imagery aides in this, acting like hidden, extra stanzas
that point to how you can flip the meanings of the poems upside down.
Blake,
William. Songs of Innocence and of
Experience. New York: The Orion Press, 1967. Print.
Frye,
Northrop. Fearful Symmetry: A Study of
William Blake. Ed. Nicholas Halmi. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1947.
Print.
The first paragraph is well written and clear. I’d like to see some hint of why you care that this partial reversal works, even at this early stage. I think your use of introductory research was effective, although it will be more effective if you use it in relationship with particular poems, too.
ReplyDeleteYour analysis of “The Blossom” is excellent. I wonder what you think of the Blossom/Bossom wordplay? You drew a snicker from me with “Is it just a random witness to the scene, a particularly involved bird enthusiast, or someone else?”, which is rarely achieved when I’m on the 2nd essay of 36!
Your reading of The Fly is excellent. I hope I remember it well, so I can refer to it in the future. I don’t really have anything to add to that.
Your closing use of Frye, while not really very specific, is still quite interesting.
Overall: This is pretty much as good as it could be without broadening a little at the end. I think your readings are well developed, detail-oriented, thought provoking, and in the well-cited spirit of Frye. I would have liked to see you push yourself a little harder on the topic if what we *do* with the next-level symmetry that you’ve mapped out, though. If nothing else, what does it do for you as a reader?