When you first look at Lynn Wards
woodcut novel, Vertigo, you think
this is going to be an easy read due to it being a “picture book”, but think
again. Due to this novel not having words to help understand the images it made
the reading much more complicated to translate. While also reading Understanding Comic, by Scott McCloud,
we were able to learn how illustrators form comics/pictures to get a strong and
valuable meaning across to the readers and we see this being well done by Ward.
By being more aware of what details to look for in images, we are able to get
deeper into Ward’s images and analyze the meaning that reading is trying to get
across.
In Chapter 4, McCloud talks about
time frames and how images can be understood as a short or long period of time.
He states, “Just as pictures and intervals between them create an illusion of
time through closure, words introduce time by which representing that which can
only exist in time—sound” (McCloud, page 94). So when I first saw this I
immediately thought of the graduation ceremony illustrated in Vertigo. In this scene we are shown the
Principle giving this speech to the graduating students of the creation of
America itself. When you first glance at the images provided by Ward you can
easily pin point what time in history the principle is actually talking about.
What Ward does though, is make this images more detailed and abstract, so if
one looks and pays attention more closely to each image they would be able to
tell that it is more than a dull speech of the upcoming of America and what the
future can hold for the fellow graduates. With this concept of time that
McCloud speaks of, we can see how Ward was able to apply it to his novel or in
this case the Principles speech. Without words, Ward was able to describe in
fewer illustrations than could have been the point the principle was trying to
get across. From what we have learned about comics, we are able to look at the
details of the images more closely and turn the illustrations into this
elaborate story full of meaning and emotions.
In class, we took a lot of time
talking about this particular scene in the novel and with an elaborate
discussion were able to come together to point out small details in the images
that may have not been clear to others. For example, we talked about how from
the start of the Principles speech he somewhat resembled a puppet, stiff and
emotionless, but when he really got into his speech later on he was arms fully
extending, smile on his face, just displaying all kinds of brilliant emotions.
This I would say can tie into this idea made by McCloud that, “words introduce
time by which representing that which can only exist in time—sound” (pg.
94). Ward was able to represent from the
start to finish the level of enthusiasm in the speech and how over time just
through his detailed images we were able to make more concepts out of the
images compared to if words would have laid the story out for us.
To conclude, we can obviously see
how Vertigo is considered a
complicated novel if you do not know how to translate or look deeper into the
images to get a more appealing and understanding story. By reading both McCloud
and Ward’s novels together definitely was a good decision because we were able to
link the one to the other forming a magnificent novel that is only illustrated
by images. It is crazy to think that just through a hundred or so images that a
story with a strong meaning can be presented without words. With Ward’s talent,
he was able to cut out so many images that would not be able to done in a word
novel; with each of his illustrations being precise and elaborate that tell a
timely story of the memorable times and the harsh times.
This piece is very diffuse. You understand why Ward is hard, you're able to explain some of what's going on in the principal's speech, along with what we said about it in class. But what are you trying to do with that discussion? Where you going?
ReplyDelete"To conclude, we can obviously see how Vertigo is considered a complicated novel if you do not know how to translate or look deeper into the images to get a more appealing and understanding story. " This isn't an argument, but the absence of an argument. This happens sometimes, but you want to focus on whatever *you* have to add to the conversation.
If you're having trouble thinking of anything to add (which happens sometimes), start by thinking small. Deal with a single image, or a fraction of an image. "Read" a rose, or a car, or a lampost. It's easiest to say nothing (accidentally) when you start out big instead of small.